I have a 1962 Econoline Pickup that has a 200 c.i. six with an E9 cylinder head casting number (I know it is not the original engine). Who can tell me the official weight of this engine (wet and dry) and the Length, width, height of the engine. I have been searching this sight and tryiing various search engines in an effort to get this information. Thanks in advance. I have been learning a lot about these engines on this site!
200 six dimensions and specifications needed
- Thread starter slipre69
- Start date
The dimensions of the 200 are identical to the 144 and 170, one of which came in your E-truck stock. The 200 is a direct bolt in replacement for the 144 and 170 so long as it has the dual bellhouse pattern, which yours must. Not sure of the weight, it should be pretty similar to the 170. I've read 385 lbs complete with accessories for the 200. I'm sure someone here knows though.
Gene Fiore
Famous Member
Go to the tech section at http://www.classicinlines.com 
They might not have everything you are looking for but there is a lot of info there!
They might not have everything you are looking for but there is a lot of info there!Thanks guys......I have read the Tech section on the ClassicInlines site and have not found the dimensions or weights. That is why I posted. I am hearing 28" long (water pump flange to rear face of block) and 385 - 400 pounds for a wet weight. Does anyone have some additional or conflicting/confirming information?
slipre69":1ojycvo1 said:
30.5 or 31.5 from crank flange to water pump snout. There are three kinds of water pump length. Height, beware that some internet details are based on some of the tall deck Aussie 200/US 250 engines, which are 1.577 to 1.666 inches taller than the 144/170/200 trio.
The D7 onwards 3.3 blocks had provision for heavier duty front drivers side boss for the Air Pump, and no provision any longer for the road draft tube. Some had the front sump dipstick boss undrilled.
The engine was 385 pounds dressed ready to run with a generator, and 365 pounds with an alternator. The early four bearing 170 cubic inch engines were 6 pounds heavier than the seven bearing 170, all of it in the crankshaft.
144, 170, 200 engines are about the same weight, even allowing for the weight difference in the crank. They call them different things in catalogues, and its easy to get the 2.8 liter 171 Cologne V6's mixed up with the 2.8 '170' and 3.3 '200' engines,
US 250 and Australian engines are a different kettle of fish, with the Argentine187, 188, 221's even more odd ball, so you have to dig deap for info when you do an internet search. So are the 3.2, 3.9 and 4.0 liter cammer Australian I6's
Similar threads
