M 90 or Paxton on a 200?

schaferstephen

Well-known member
Hey all,

I'm looking at building up my 200 in the fall, and I'm not 100% if I'm going to go naturally aspirated or add a supercharger. I'm not doing a turbo because I already installed headers. So having said that, I've been reading the two following articles:

viewtopic.php?t=19007&highlight=mustangaroo

viewtopic.php?f=22&t=56560

Here's my thoughts: my car won't be a daily driver, but it isn't going to be a raced either, so I want something that will be fairly maintainable and not pushing extreme limits. Definitely no more than 10 lbs of boost, if that much. I will definitely be using a CI aluminum head, and I'll probably order pistons and a cam from them as well. If I do go with a supercharger, what cam profile and pistons should I be looking at? I do want to use pump gas so i'll be shooting for a CR at or under 9.5, tops, but I understand it has to be significantly lower to utilize a supercharger.

Is there an advantage to either an M90 or a Paxton, or does it depend on which is easier to find? Also, more specifically, which are the easiest to mount on a 200 straight six? I see they make them for different cars but obviously, they weren't exactly made for these engines!! ;)

Thanks for all the help, yall!
 
from what I've seen, it looks like the m90 is much easier to find, and much cheaper. The Paxton (IMo) looks easier to install.
 
Back
Top