6bangerbill
Well-known member
Does anyone understand what occures inside a siamese type intake port?
The late chevy 6 groups 1,2 ; 3,4 and 5,6 intake ports together, so that two cylinders feed from each of three ports. I have read that Jim Headrick in 1978 flowed 319 cfm @ 28" of h2o thru one of these ports producing 650 hp. THe guy was a wizzard with a chevy and suposedly ground his cams with different lobe centers on different cylinders to compensate for the siamese effect. I assume that these ports act as a common plenum to feed only two cylinders, but dont have a clue about how valve timing would compensate for anything. It would seem that port air velocity would not be sufficent for intake ram tuning because each cylinder sees such a large port section area.Maybe one port robs wet fuel from the adjacent cylinder inside the port, since adjacent cylinders dont fire 180 degrees appart. I know that the siamese ports work better than single ports with an IR set up with Weber carbs because each cylinder draws from two venturies instead of one. Commonly IR systems choke off airflow due to extreem air velocity in venturies.Notice that prostockers dont use IR systems. I understand that sonic velocity is the max speed that can flow in a port without some sort of boost.
The late chevy 6 groups 1,2 ; 3,4 and 5,6 intake ports together, so that two cylinders feed from each of three ports. I have read that Jim Headrick in 1978 flowed 319 cfm @ 28" of h2o thru one of these ports producing 650 hp. THe guy was a wizzard with a chevy and suposedly ground his cams with different lobe centers on different cylinders to compensate for the siamese effect. I assume that these ports act as a common plenum to feed only two cylinders, but dont have a clue about how valve timing would compensate for anything. It would seem that port air velocity would not be sufficent for intake ram tuning because each cylinder sees such a large port section area.Maybe one port robs wet fuel from the adjacent cylinder inside the port, since adjacent cylinders dont fire 180 degrees appart. I know that the siamese ports work better than single ports with an IR set up with Weber carbs because each cylinder draws from two venturies instead of one. Commonly IR systems choke off airflow due to extreem air velocity in venturies.Notice that prostockers dont use IR systems. I understand that sonic velocity is the max speed that can flow in a port without some sort of boost.