62Ranchero200
Famous Member
Greetings Ford Six Fans,
Have a Holley 1946 that came with the '80 200 in my '62 Ranchero. In the "Introductions" forum, got into a discussion about which port to use for the vacuum advance on the distributor, and manifold vs. ported vacuum. I felt like the "Introductions" forum wasn't really meant for such an in-depth discussion, so starting another thread here.
Read the article hear in the "Hardcore Tech" forum about manifold vs. ported vacuum. Have seen both in the Falcon Six Handbook and in David's post that the DSII vacuum advance should be connected to a ported vacuum source. The distributor has some upper bushing wear and I'm unsure if the vacuum advance cannister is operating properly, so it may be replaced soon, and the carb will be replaced eventually. However, I'm curious.
If I understand corrrectly, "manifold" vacuum comes from a carb port _below_ the throttle plates (exposed to full manifold vacuum) and "ported" vacuum comes from a carb port _above" the throttle plates (exposed to less than full manifold vacuum). By that logic, the vacuum port labeled as "spark port" on the Holley 1946 carb diagram (from the "Carb Doctor" web site) is a manifold vacuum port, and the vacuum ports labeled as "EGR vacuum" and "Venturi vacuum" are ported vacuum ports (see embedded images).
I currently have my distributor vacuum advance hooked up to the "spark port", which I would think would be full manifold vacuum. This seems contradictory to me, since I'm following the diagram, but everyone says the vacuum advance should be hooked up to a ported vacuum source.
I'm going to check all three of these ports with a vacuum gauge, both at idle and at 2,000 RPM or so. I may try hooking up the vacuum advance to the other ports to check the result. Currently, the vacuum advance is advancing the engine about 20 degrees at idle, which I know is not correct.
Bob the Builder
Have a Holley 1946 that came with the '80 200 in my '62 Ranchero. In the "Introductions" forum, got into a discussion about which port to use for the vacuum advance on the distributor, and manifold vs. ported vacuum. I felt like the "Introductions" forum wasn't really meant for such an in-depth discussion, so starting another thread here.
Read the article hear in the "Hardcore Tech" forum about manifold vs. ported vacuum. Have seen both in the Falcon Six Handbook and in David's post that the DSII vacuum advance should be connected to a ported vacuum source. The distributor has some upper bushing wear and I'm unsure if the vacuum advance cannister is operating properly, so it may be replaced soon, and the carb will be replaced eventually. However, I'm curious.
If I understand corrrectly, "manifold" vacuum comes from a carb port _below_ the throttle plates (exposed to full manifold vacuum) and "ported" vacuum comes from a carb port _above" the throttle plates (exposed to less than full manifold vacuum). By that logic, the vacuum port labeled as "spark port" on the Holley 1946 carb diagram (from the "Carb Doctor" web site) is a manifold vacuum port, and the vacuum ports labeled as "EGR vacuum" and "Venturi vacuum" are ported vacuum ports (see embedded images).
I currently have my distributor vacuum advance hooked up to the "spark port", which I would think would be full manifold vacuum. This seems contradictory to me, since I'm following the diagram, but everyone says the vacuum advance should be hooked up to a ported vacuum source.
I'm going to check all three of these ports with a vacuum gauge, both at idle and at 2,000 RPM or so. I may try hooking up the vacuum advance to the other ports to check the result. Currently, the vacuum advance is advancing the engine about 20 degrees at idle, which I know is not correct.
Bob the Builder