Tri-power intake for aluminum head?

Was there ever a tri-Weber sidedraft intake that will fit the aluminum head? I did find a dual quad intake from ausispeed. I believe that I have reached my iron tri-power heads maximum potential and I'm looking for something that will flow more and have even better air/fuel distribution to be used with my nitrous setup.
 
double post
 
there R threads on here that discuss the Lynx and 1s sim to the Red Line.
Ck if 4 the OZ or the 1 at VI as there's some differences...
Don't forget how close the shock tower is on most the vehicles seen at this site.
U need to state the intake is removed for the VI or may B I'm just dumb :shock:
 
1st looks like the Lynx
2nd is for the Oz 2v (iron)
niether fit the CI/Vi head

When U say 'alu head' what do U mean...

I'd luv the ol vett Carter YH (a side draft) or DCOEs~
But still say the 6 Keihin's the way to go 4 a race 200.
 
64 200 ranchero":1bum6tau said:
The vintage inlines head. I thought that they shared the same intake pattern as the Australian 2v
take a look at the parts U can C in pic, online catalogues. Mike designed it for our motors.
I C exh & intake port differences.
Unless the head adds alot of hight no side drafts will fit between there'n the shock tower.
If it duz add hight I think "the 60s/70s ford low hood" will B banging into it.

Go slo. :unsure: Do ur due diligence. :eek: Its a large cash outlay. (y)
 
I'm going to do more research. Maybe I'll just Fab up an intake. I don't know anything about bike carbs, but it does seem the easy way to go. Are they as tunable as car carbs? I will definitely be getting the aluminum head in the future for its weight reduction, higher compression capabilities, and better flow. I'm just not a fan of how the ci/vi intake was designed. It looks like the outer carbs will be starved of fuel just as the stock us iron head is. The ci/vi intake looks like it would work great for fuel injection.
 
"...Are they as tunable as car carbs?..."
they run on an entirely different principal (needing less tuning). Jet it'n forget it.
For me the biggest hassle is figuring the throttle linkage (like any multiple carb).
Ck out the various links I've supplied.

The net has a few guys, 1 who visited us here a yr or so ago. Shows the manifold, prts'n assembly, car on the rdway, etc
If U can fab an intake ur 1/2 way there, just understanding the carbs (new 2 U) & design R left.
 
64 200 ranchero":1xcaq2xa said:
The vintage inlines head. I thought that they shared the same intake pattern as the Australian 2v
They do, I've had both. a little port work to make them match is all that is needed.

Chad, your way of writing (texting) gives me a headache.
 
That's what I thought, but Chad does have me thinking about the bike carbs setup. I can easily build a plenum and possibly mount up to 7 or 8 bike carbs.
 
Plenty of room. We just need to do it Nick style, and turn a custom Rectangular Hole Section header exhaust into an intake.

Three carbs, and your job is done. Just enough space if the carbs are about 3.18" off the line of the passenger side head studs

DSCF0019.jpg


turbo2.jpg


For height, three 2-bbl DGAV or 5200 carbs converted to simultanoues with 30 mm venturs will allow a power peak rev range of about 4200 rpm to work. 1-3/16" is the crtical dimension for port on port carbs. The ports on the Vintage Inline head are 1-5/8", so you need a

Or three YFA Carters or 1946 Holley 1-bbls. These are 1-5/16" venturi carbs. They can work well

Or three 2-bbl Rochester 2CG's with the bigger 327 barrels.

Care of Martin_F, May 17, 2012 , https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/thr ... 14.699158/

1 1/4" flange, 1 7/16" throttle bore, 1 3/32" venturi - 278 cfm <---- Bad choice, strangled
1 1/2" flange, 1 11/16" throttle bore, 1 3/16" venturi - 352 cfm <---- ok choice revs to 4200 rpm for peak power, still strangled
1 1/2" flange, 1 11/16" throttle bore, 1 1/4" venturi - 381 cfm <---- nicer choice revs to 4600 rpm for peak power
1 1/2" flange, 1 11/16" throttle bore, 1 5/16" venturi - 423 cfm <---- better choice revs to over 5200 rpm for peak power
1 1/2" flange, 1 11/16" throttle bore, 1 3/8" venturi - 435 cfm <---- best choice, revs to 5600 rpm for peak power

With a The Frenchtown Flyer style intermediate shaft, you could put them on under the spring tower braces. Venturi area is critical according to the Weber Aero engine chart. On tri one barrels, not so much. When it becomes port on port, the carb venturi sizes have to go way up to reduce air speed, and allow pulse tuning. Higher air speed kills top end power, stiffling the top end, and removing the ability to rev while making horsepower without a huge tail off


Holley 2300 series 350's and 500 cfm are too just tall and have a base too wide unless you cut down the choke horn, and get clever with linkages.
 
That's pretty interesting, I'd love to see that in action. I'm going to take a few measurements, make a few sketches, and post back here. Thanks for all the input.
 
"... the aluminum head..."
it is a dwn draft intake.
Do U wanna mill the runners and modify the removable intake?
What R U lookin 2 do? I'm lost, sorry.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I could C 6 Keihin motorcycle carbs adapted to the head w/o the intake it comes with (y) ...
(but not on my bronk & w/a 200/3.3 motor) ie:
Keihin and Mikuni
http://www.triumphspitfire.com/carbchoices.html.


http://www.altiss.com/ThrottleBodies.html

http://www.turbosport.co.uk/showthread.php?t=103402

http://www.danstengineering.co.uk/

Our visitor Ron Ward
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWM5-xZ1q0M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIeh3Bf_8sQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-EVAnY7WKQ

CUT OFF LOG or INTAKE
Sawed off Log
OpelGT+3point3
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=74153&p=570045&hilit=Cutting+off+the+log#p570045

Chopped Log and Intake
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=77786&p=599485#p599485

http://www.v-performance.com/products/air_fuel.html
 
Back
Top