Satnav is always out a few miles per hour from my experience. Everytime I calibrate my 82 Mustang, 98 Explorer or 96 RAV4, by the elasped time between five 1km markers, the readings it gives is 2% lower than what I get by actual distance covered. Funny thing is my 82 Mustang has almost exactly the same gearing as your car with its 190/65 390 tires and 2.73:1 diff. 2241 rpm at 60 mph. And both my RAV4 (4-stage auto) and my Exploder (5-stage auto) loose less than 200 rpm max at 60mph when the lock-up clutch loops out, so thats about what I'd expect for maximum torque converter loss.
Three things to remember are that
1) the loaded wheel radius differs by about 2.2 % from the static radius.
2) a C4 has clutch slip,as stated
3) The correct formula for a 23 to 27" tire must take acount of tire crush, so it is:- calculated radius in meters (good ole imperial times 0.0254) times 60 times pi, all over the diff ratio. That gives km/h per 1000 rpm. To get out of the Kingdom of France back into Olde Worlde Imperial, divide by 1.60934.
So the correct modern rendition for an old Mustang cross ply is most likely a P185/78 SR 14 replacement, which would be ((185*0.78*2)+(14*25.4))=644.2mm, or 0.6442 m or 25.36 inches
Divide by 1.022 for wheel crush (0.6303 m or 24.82 inches)
Then curn through 0.6303*60*3.141 and divide the answer by 2.83.
41.98 km/h per 1000 rpm, or 26.08 mph per 1000rpm. At 60 mph, you should be doing 2300 rpm exactly. Based on what I've seen in lock up clutch cars, T/C slip is indeed 6% max under load, but even lockup clutches still have 1% slip unless its an AOD.