If accessories could kill… MPG

I would like to put forward misaligned tires as an economy/power killer. What do you guys think?
IMO, yes they would have an effect, as to how much, Id say they would have to be VERY missaligned, as in just about squealing when moving to have a noticable effect of fuel. Most people when have it looked into way before that occured. Underinflation also has this effect. However since a lot of USA people drive the large barges, the the drag from tyres and wind has a major effect. Given that vehicles do not travel at a nice steady speed, more stop start, mass is a major effect of fuel economy, it takes heaps of energy to get 2500kg moving from a standstill, and that energy is chucked away when stopping. Since i hate the slushies, thats another wastefull item to be considered. So if you REALLY wanted high economy you would take guidance from the Pommes, small light Diesel cars with manual transmissions.
 
Tire underinflation is a major source of drag. Think about riding a bike with low tires. I've heard its a percent per pound.
Tire tread design is significant also, also more than one would think. Basically, the louder your tire the more drag it has. Late in my semi trucking career I went from knobby tread to steer-tires on the 8 drive wheels. It made a measurable increase in fuel economy, and they tracked better. In snow the large-block knobbys would pack full of snow in the wide gaps and were then useless for traction. The straight-grove steer tires were actually better. Wish I had done it sooner.
 
creating an engine that was way larger than needed is common but you know , people wnt more power because for some reason it makes them feel "stronger" although this is of course rediculoius , but thats human nature. most of the mileage put on a car is in city traffic where it is impossible to achieve the maximum speed. the excess horepower is spent racing oneanother to the next red light.

creating an inefficiant engine and using a radiator to blow a lot of the energy in the air behind ou was a stupid idea from the get go, it proves how inefficiant gasoline powered engines are and always were.

automakers continue to change designs making a long lived chassis impossible , In reality cars could be made to fit a standard frame and the frame could be reusable and be made of alunimum and lightweght alloys drastically changin the power to weight ratio.

its possible to use currrent technologies to build repairable cars that are fuel efficient but what automakers wan to produce is more cars, noit ones that could be repaired , Thats the sort of thing that happens when decisions are made by profit analysis rather than common sense.

regenerative braking could have been used long ago , but it was never developed until electric cars took over the market. our gas cars waste tons of energy by braking before each traffic light and then restarting each time the vehicle is stopped and put back into motion a great amount of energy is spent needlesssly heating the brake discks and pads.

with the up and coming electric cars the automakers had a chance to make decisions to build repairable lightweight cars that last instead we have a lot of teslas and other junk on the road that is designed to become obsolete as fast as the batteries.. by the time the batterys expire the cars are not worth rebuilding due to the cost of all the unique and proprieatry parts. Sadly it just more engineered examplse of engineered obsolescence.

its probably not a realistic hope but I coudl definitely see a well designed repairable and lightweight vehicle that is electric or hybrid and that uses standardized and replacable components . what seems ot stand in the way is powerful corportations who make desisions that are bad for consumers.

th overalll cost is a lot of money being spent by consumers and a lot of it leaving the country to fund foregn automakers. The profiteering and money based decisions caused a lot of environmental pollution and damage for future generations . automakers easily achieved 30 and even 50 MPG cars bcack as early as the 70's and yet today, some 70 years later,
cars are still being sold that get very poor gas milage.

for some vehicles like a flatdeck truck or a dumptruch good mileage cant; be expected but its just not necessary to have everyone driving vehicles that cant; even meet 30 MPG being used as daily drivers. it was possible for governing powers to put mileage standards upon donmestic cars half a centry ago but the decision makers were never very foreward thinking. the economy revolves around building more , not building smarter.

I dont police the world and just like you , Ill drive what I want o but i can at least recognise where things went so terribly wrong I do not have solutions, any fix is greater than any personal impact I alone may make.
 
Automatic trans these days are more efficient and some even surpass manual trans (or so they say). They are just not as fun to drive. My truck has the M5OD R2. Im fixing to start up a youtube channel where Ill test and experiment to see what helps save fuel outside of the norm. Then depending on how things go, change it over for performance. If im lucky it can be both.
I'm 100% with Aussie 7 Mains.

Even Twin clutch 8 to 10 speed automatics are still not as efficient as a good 5 or six speed manual gearbox, or even a four speed with you overdrive SROD.


A torque converter automatic, like the ZF based Ford and GM truck 6 speed, still shows a significant loss in the statutory Federal Motor Vehicle FTP 75 11 mile LA Basin 23 stop Dyno driven miles per gallon figures verses the Five and six speed manual versions ( if there is one), primarily due to drive train losses at the converter, even when locked.
 
Back
Top