IS THIS A 200 or 250ci??? =S

[Anonymous]

I've been searching for videos of engines ford 200 or 250 and i did'nt found nothing i'd like to see videos of some engines 200 with three carbs.. i've found awesome photos and i want to watch these engines acelerating and racing 1/4 mile.. in youtube.com there's not videos of these engines has someone seen a video or have you a video of an awesome engine like this?? sorry form my bad english

 

[Anonymous]

There used to be a video on the ford six performance site of a 64 1/2 mustang doing a mega burnout with a modified 6.

 

[wallaka]

Why does everybody keep claiming they have a "64½" Mustang or call every 65 that? :roll:
Just one of my pet peeves.

Anyhow, here's a couple of vids.

Click here to see VideoClick here to see VideoClick here to see Video
Click here to see VideoClick here to see VideoClick here to see Video
Click here to see Video

The guys are on the site regularly.

 

[rommaster2]

Why does everybody keep claiming they have a "64½" Mustang or call every 65 that? :roll:
Just one of my pet peeves.

Anyhow, here's a couple of vids.

Click here to see VideoClick here to see VideoClick here to see Video
Click here to see VideoClick here to see VideoClick here to see Video
Click here to see Video

The guys are on the site regularly.

Well there is one way to tell for sure that i can think of whether or not it is really a 64 1\2. Originally they came with 260s, also possible that it could be a 170 straight six, i cant remember if they dropped the 170 as the main stang engine in 65 or if it was later on.

Also though technically my falcon would be a 64 1\2, it was made in august of 64, but its a 65 year model *shrug*. I also see tons of people saying thier 65 falcon is a 64, but they have different grills so who knows.

 

[Anonymous]

I've found awesome photos and i want to watch these engines acelerating and racing 1/4 mile..

Here is my turbo 200 running the dragstrip:
http://jusspress.com/day.php?userid=183 ... ime=110611

 

[shmoozo]

Why does everybody keep claiming they have a "64½" Mustang or call every 65 that? :roll:
Just one of my pet peeves.

Well there is one way to tell for sure that i can think of whether or not it is really a 64 1\2. Originally they came with 260s, also possible that it could be a 170 straight six, i cant remember if they dropped the 170 as the main stang engine in 65 or if it was later on.

Also though technically my falcon would be a 64 1\2, it was made in august of 64, but its a 65 year model *shrug*. I also see tons of people saying thier 65 falcon is a 64, but they have different grills so who knows.

For anybody who wants just a little info about engine choices and available body styles for the early Mustangs (including the real 64 1/2 models), here's a useful link:

Ford Classics - Mustang Specs

 

[wallaka]

Thanks for the link. I've heard about various ways to tell, but it aggravates me when EVERYBODY refers to their car as being one. There were very few made, it's like everybody that has a Shelby clone claiming that it's really a Shelby. There are more "Shelbys" on the road now than were ever made.

Most people have no idea what constitutes the early '65 Mustangs, they just say it to try to be cool.

Like I said, just one of those things that irritates me. Didn't mean to cause a big deal over it. Well, not too much

Linc, I love that sound! So different than anything else.

 

[Anonymous]

Linc, I love that sound! So different than anything else.

First time I listened to the video, I thought: "Cummins diesel Dodge"

It sounds way different inside the car

 

[Anonymous]

Thanks for the videos excellent..
i could see that in all these races the ford 200 losed the races
everybody says me, and i think i must change my 200 for a 302 V8

 

[addo]

Well, you have cheap fuel in your country - so that is one thing not to worry about.