Ha ha.
There is a 'rimpull' curve that Cat 789's use to work out cartage an haul times. The gradient is calculated, and then you look at the gearing, and the actual load the engine is under is calculated. This will determine exactly how much load there is on the engine. From this, the speed can be calcualted
Whats hapening is the power of the engine at those revs has been sapped by
a) areodynamic drag (very slight)
b) tire rolling resistance (considerable with the weight, size and load)
c) the drive train losses, about 27 % on a manual rwd truck
d) the air density alters the drag ( a tiny, and negligable amount)
e) the gradient (the perecntage gradient adds weight to the vehicle. A 12% gradient adds a proportianl extra weight to the vehicle, equal to some thing like Weight x Gravity x the sine of the gradient in degrees)
I'm guessing, but what you'll find is that at 2800 rpm, there is about 85 hp or so at the flywheel, or perhaps 159 lb-ft at 2800 rpm , and this is how much power is consumed by the total of those items a) to e) above. If you want 50 mph, find another 20 hp!
I'm gonna pike out there, but its very easy to calculate all this using Bowling and Gripo's website, found by clicking on to the Ford Six.Com oval and going to the tech forum, or look at this old post.
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1708 . I have updated to imperial now, and it is covered under the vortual realitiy drag strip thread
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6711.
NB// New imperial formula is
Quote:
target speed 3*drag factor*frontal area(found in books) all over 147773 to get rear wheel horsepower reguired. To that you must add required tire rolling resistance. Target amount is 8 hp for a 195 section tire on a 2000 pound car
Example for 135 mph target on a Willys drag racer with a 0.45 cd, and 25 feet of frontal area:-
(135*135*135*0.45*25)=27679219. Then this gets divided by 147773.
Rear wheel power needed is 187.3 hp, plus 11.6 hp, which is 198.9 hp.
Solve for 185.1 hp, try speed and rolling resistance values until the equation equals 185.1 hp
Doing yours, I'd say a cd of 0.70, a 30 square foot of frontal area, about 5 hp for tire loses , and that all gets factored into the equation
(35*35*35*0.70*30)=900375. Then this gets divided by 147773.
Rear wheel power needed is 6.1 hp, plus 5 hp for tire drag, which is 11.1 hp. That is about 14 hp at the flywheel. The gradient and weight combined is therefore responsible for the loss of 71 hp!
Optionally, I could do it my self, but I'm busy working out how to programe a CNC profile cutting for 64 Ecconolines X-flow transmission adaptor.
Excuses, excuses...