New cam from FSPP?

[JackFish]

http://cquesttechnologies.com/fspp/prod ... 2D10%2DDHS

New to me anyway, but since I haven't yet installed the 264/274/112 that I have I was thinking about seeing if Mike would swap this one. Here are the specs:

Adv dur - 268/274 Dur @.050 - 208/218 Lift -.455/480 Lobe center - 110* Range - 1600-5400

I'm a newbie at this but it would seem to have a smoother rise and a higher maximum lift than this one:

Adv dur - 264/274 Dur @.050 - 214/224 Lift -.450/.450 Lobe center - 112* Range - 1400-5200

Do do these specs translate into more horsepower and top-end? Economy? Would the performance difference between these be really obvious?
Which would you pick for your sleepy/sleeper Fairmont wagon? It's an automatic and I have a head with all the tricks ready for it.

 

[80broncoman]

Adv dur - 264/274 Dur @.050 - 214/224 Lift -.450/.450 Lobe center - 112* Range - 1400-5200

I think the Rpm range is off to me. Maybe it will start at 1400 in a higher (10 to 1)compression 250. But in a a 9 to 1 200 ? no way it will be start working more like @ 2000 rpm up to 5500. With a slightly looser converter it will work great off the line. If compression is not up to at least 8.8 to 1 it wont be a sleeper. I'd also try to get some 1.6 rockers for it.

 

[JackFish]

I have a head with all the tricks ready for it.

To be more specific, the head is milled .050, SI valves, springs w/dampers, and the block is still stock. Won't be rebuilding that for a while.$$
I plan to cc the head but I don't know the CR.

 

[AzCoupe]

I have no problem swapping the cams.

I've had a couple guys remark about the RPM ranges. Could be a typo by the web designer when he wwas redesigning the website. Or I may have screwed up when I wrote down the specs (during a phone conversation). I'll get in touch with Clay Smith and verify.