New input from the Braniac suspension types

Anlushac11

1K+
VIP
OK.

I was given a complete 96 Mustang GT front spindle, caliper, and rotor setup for both sides. I have no money in the 96 Spindle.

The story is you cannot use 96+ SN95 Mustang front brake spindles because the steering arm where tie rod attaches is straight where the 94-95 Mustang has a 1 inch upturn to account for the difference.

Image of the difference in spindles: http://www.maximummotorsports.com/

Running the 96 spindles apparently causes the steering rack tier rod arms to be lowered 1 inch which makes bump steer very bad and it cannot be adjust out.

I came across the Steeda X2 balljoints: http://www.steeda.com/products/x2_balljoints.php

Steeda says the X2 balljoint is intended to raise the spindle back up to regain suspension geometry on lowered cars. What I dont see is how much it raises it.

If I read this correctly I can use the Steeda X2 balljoints to move the spindle up relative to the straightline of the steering rack to regain steering geometry.

If I add in the Steeda offset rack bushings then this would allow me to adust the rack up or down to further regain steerings geometry.

I am planning to run front coil over strut kit so can adjust ride height independent of the spindle location.

http://www.steeda.com/products/aluminum ... shings.php

Please pick apart my attempts to use 96 spindles or please give me advice to better the situation.
 
Back
Top