Starting to step on some 1s thread pretty heavily.
Sorry,
(no excuse) I just get into it & forget, not the 1st time. Gotta keep a lill more centered & not get so excited ~
Here's the entry, reposted here as a redirect offa the guy's back:
I guess for the "1 per cyl" a cardboard template (after the logectomy & mill pass)
and a total redesign of the carb linkage/spacing is in order.
The experts here R suggesting the Keihins? because they flow more appropriately for the combustion chamber & cyl sz? No rejeting or other internal adaptation?
The intake would B a one-design.
I'd think these would not B 'progressive' but 'unitized' (operate together) .
Would a rod linkage be suggested (w/may B Lokar cable to the skinny peddle)?
May B I better take this to a new thread - getting away from the SU/CI,
Sorry.
Sorry,
(no excuse) I just get into it & forget, not the 1st time. Gotta keep a lill more centered & not get so excited ~
Here's the entry, reposted here as a redirect offa the guy's back:
I guess for the "1 per cyl" a cardboard template (after the logectomy & mill pass)
and a total redesign of the carb linkage/spacing is in order.
The experts here R suggesting the Keihins? because they flow more appropriately for the combustion chamber & cyl sz? No rejeting or other internal adaptation?
The intake would B a one-design.
I'd think these would not B 'progressive' but 'unitized' (operate together) .
Would a rod linkage be suggested (w/may B Lokar cable to the skinny peddle)?
May B I better take this to a new thread - getting away from the SU/CI,
Sorry.