Let me preface this by saying that I am not new at engine repair. I am not being coy and trying to say that I do this for a living or have assembled a thousand engines, but probably like many of you I have honestly bolted together dozens of them since my youth. Some of them were actually "built" with aftermarket components and measured properly, others were bread and butter rebuilds that were only checked using plastigauge. Either way, I am very familiar with the workings of most common piston engines and I pay attention to the details when I have them apart. I have never had a catastrophic engine failure due to any mistake of mine.
With that being said, I just stumbled across an article written about a rebuild of one of our beloved little sixes and wanted to pass it along as I believe it contains either a terrible typo, or the solution to a valve timing problem that myself and a few other here have encountered. It could also be of no consequence, just looking for another opinion or knowledge from someone that knows about this for certain. So please don't just google this to verify and then leave a comment like " Well, yeah dummy, of course that's how it works."
This article states in a sidebar that the marks on the timing sets for these engines are actually NOT supposed to align at the common 12 and 6 o'clock positions, but rather at 2 and 8 o'clock!!!! Without actually having an example in front of me, it is difficult for me to to discern where that would place the marks as they approach the 12 and 6 positions. Could this be why myself and a few others had the cam timing so far off on our sixes?
Am I just somehow out of the loop and is this common knowledge here? Even when doing timing belts on DOHC engines in the past in which the timing marks are more complicated, it has always been pretty clearly marked, or at least the set came with instructions that explained the markings.
It is noted on the sidebar with the photo showing the timing set installed on the engine:
http://www.mustangmonthly.com/techartic ... ewall.html
With that being said, I just stumbled across an article written about a rebuild of one of our beloved little sixes and wanted to pass it along as I believe it contains either a terrible typo, or the solution to a valve timing problem that myself and a few other here have encountered. It could also be of no consequence, just looking for another opinion or knowledge from someone that knows about this for certain. So please don't just google this to verify and then leave a comment like " Well, yeah dummy, of course that's how it works."
This article states in a sidebar that the marks on the timing sets for these engines are actually NOT supposed to align at the common 12 and 6 o'clock positions, but rather at 2 and 8 o'clock!!!! Without actually having an example in front of me, it is difficult for me to to discern where that would place the marks as they approach the 12 and 6 positions. Could this be why myself and a few others had the cam timing so far off on our sixes?
Am I just somehow out of the loop and is this common knowledge here? Even when doing timing belts on DOHC engines in the past in which the timing marks are more complicated, it has always been pretty clearly marked, or at least the set came with instructions that explained the markings.
It is noted on the sidebar with the photo showing the timing set installed on the engine:
http://www.mustangmonthly.com/techartic ... ewall.html