If you use the 13cc 200 pistons you'll be back down in the hole... Are you going to use different rods to bring them back up?
On my 250 build, my oem pistons were .108" down not including the gasket. Previous owner had replaced the head gsket w/ a felpro and didn't mill the head. Static compression was @ a whopping 8:1
I used Silvolite 2.5 HSC pistons which brought me up .056", decked the block .032" and ended up with a deck height of .020". Ended up with .040" overbore to clean up the block. This left me with .064" in the hole using a Victor gasket and a SCR of 10.7:1 and a DCR of ~8.5:1 with the cam I'm using and assumed 60cc chambers. To help with that I had the pistons dished 8cc's in a D shaped dish the matches the combustion chambers. This brought me to 9.7:1 SCR and 7.7:1 DCR. My head is getting done now, C9 head, having later intake valves and 144 intakes installed for the exhaust, valve guides and cleanup of the exhaust flange and a minimum clean up of the mating flange. The head has 62 cc chambers. So I'm hoping for no more than 1-2 cc's lost.
I mis-measured the original deck height by 5 thou, I was shooting for a quench distance under 60 thou. Either that or the machinist didn't take the right cut on the deck, unlikely. I did it this way b/c I was on a tight budget and just trying to optimize the engine a little better. Low end power and torq, not high RPM. Saved alot of money over custom pistons and rods or even 255 pistons which are about as rare as hens teeth or very expensive and would also need dished more than the 2.5cc's worth of valve relief in them. I think it worked out OK, I can still use an aluminum head with 54cc chambers w/ a corteco gasket and be @ 10.2 SCR and 8.1 DCR. One thing I did not do and hopefully won't regret is have the rods reconditioned and upgraded.
Anyway, just thought I'd share my experience with you. Sounds like you want to build a higher revving engine though than what I built for the Econoline. Cheap cast pistons milled may not be adequate for your needs/goals.