So I was looking at the Dyno results #3A and #3B and the torque increased from 120 @ 3950 rpm to 140 @ 2500 rpm.
The increased torque is good but having it at 2500 vs 3950 rpm is even better. The exhaust valve is a bit larger and the compression ratio is a half point higher in #3B which doesn't seem to drastic so the major contributing factor must be the direct mount 2v. If you have different insight I would like to know. Thanks.
The increased torque is good but having it at 2500 vs 3950 rpm is even better. The exhaust valve is a bit larger and the compression ratio is a half point higher in #3B which doesn't seem to drastic so the major contributing factor must be the direct mount 2v. If you have different insight I would like to know. Thanks.