Results totally not what I expected.
They recommended a 274deg dur (IIRC 224deg at .050") and .480lift cam with 110deg lobe centers. They recommended degreeing in cam at 107deg.
This is totally different from the Iskendarian cam which IIRC was about 256deg int/247deg exh advertised and .420" lift and 114deg lobe centers with 1.6 rockers.
The Clay Smith cam seems way high on duration and lift is outside log heads flow range.
If Im reading this correctly they are recommending running the cam 3deg retarded.
Not sure to make of this. The Isky cam seems too mild and the Clay Smith cam seems too wild.
The Clay Smith cam was based on data sheet I filled out so it should be good for my needs, just suprised at recommendation based on my limited cam knowledge.
They recommended a 274deg dur (IIRC 224deg at .050") and .480lift cam with 110deg lobe centers. They recommended degreeing in cam at 107deg.
This is totally different from the Iskendarian cam which IIRC was about 256deg int/247deg exh advertised and .420" lift and 114deg lobe centers with 1.6 rockers.
The Clay Smith cam seems way high on duration and lift is outside log heads flow range.
If Im reading this correctly they are recommending running the cam 3deg retarded.
Not sure to make of this. The Isky cam seems too mild and the Clay Smith cam seems too wild.
The Clay Smith cam was based on data sheet I filled out so it should be good for my needs, just suprised at recommendation based on my limited cam knowledge.