I have tried 3 of the 4 different mechanical fuel pump options that I'm aware of (didn't include the very early vacuum/fuel pump/wiper model cause she's an odd duck)...and not really interested in electric at this time.
The first one I ran for the past several years was the airtex. Although I know they don't have a great reputation for a quality part, it performed well until about 6-8mos ago when I thought I heard some new lifter noise. Turns out it was the airtex making racket that kept getting louder and more consistent, so I switched to an NOS carter (2nd pic above) not wanting to risk a major purge of fuel into the crankcase or damage to the cam eccentric.
The problem I've run into with both 1100's using the carter is that when trying to start the car after 1 week (sometimes less), I've had to crank the engine excessively and steadily pump the throttle to get her to start...like she has lost all prime.
With the airtex I could go 1-2 weeks easily without having to give more than 2-3 pedal strokes (often just the recommended 1) and she'd fire right off.
I recently picked up a NOS 'Motorcraft'(?) pump like the one I had on the car about 8 years ago (and that was on the car since '88 till I switched to the airtex). My lines are in good shape so I got this one to see if it eliminates the issue.
I've not seen nearly as many of the above pumps around, and they look like they might be a 'mid-year change part' : They look alot like the '65 and earlier pump with an adapted top portion to remove the filter body.
So its got me wondering :nono: which bring up questions :roll: ...
1. Could my 'bleed off' issue be an internal issue with the Carter not holding line pressure, causing it to lose prime?
2. It's curious that when the Carter bled off, that there would still not be enough fuel in the bowl to fire her up, could the bleed off be draining the fuel bowl in the carbs? (siphoning the fuel bowl?...that would seem wierd)
3. Anyone know if there are any major differences in these pumps? (psi rating, etc).
4. Also it seemed that later on the carter became standard, but didn't the eccentric arm or the whole pump change at some point on the 200 in the late 70's or so?
5. Anyone know the timeline for the various pumps?
6. Anyone have any strong preferences in their selection(other than electric)? Resons why?
I'm swapping back carbs so I'll change to the NOS '66 at some point and see what it does, after some mpg and plug readings. I like the idea of going back to the '66 'Motorcraft' pump (the one that looks like it was an adaption of the '65 pump) in part cause it was original (which for me is nice when it works) and it appears to be serviceable, which raises one last question...
7.Anyone know if the bladder assembly for the '65 'filter on' pump would work with the '66 'Motorcraft' pump?
Thanks in advance for any and all input!
The first one I ran for the past several years was the airtex. Although I know they don't have a great reputation for a quality part, it performed well until about 6-8mos ago when I thought I heard some new lifter noise. Turns out it was the airtex making racket that kept getting louder and more consistent, so I switched to an NOS carter (2nd pic above) not wanting to risk a major purge of fuel into the crankcase or damage to the cam eccentric.
The problem I've run into with both 1100's using the carter is that when trying to start the car after 1 week (sometimes less), I've had to crank the engine excessively and steadily pump the throttle to get her to start...like she has lost all prime.
With the airtex I could go 1-2 weeks easily without having to give more than 2-3 pedal strokes (often just the recommended 1) and she'd fire right off.
I recently picked up a NOS 'Motorcraft'(?) pump like the one I had on the car about 8 years ago (and that was on the car since '88 till I switched to the airtex). My lines are in good shape so I got this one to see if it eliminates the issue.
I've not seen nearly as many of the above pumps around, and they look like they might be a 'mid-year change part' : They look alot like the '65 and earlier pump with an adapted top portion to remove the filter body.
So its got me wondering :nono: which bring up questions :roll: ...
1. Could my 'bleed off' issue be an internal issue with the Carter not holding line pressure, causing it to lose prime?
2. It's curious that when the Carter bled off, that there would still not be enough fuel in the bowl to fire her up, could the bleed off be draining the fuel bowl in the carbs? (siphoning the fuel bowl?...that would seem wierd)
3. Anyone know if there are any major differences in these pumps? (psi rating, etc).
4. Also it seemed that later on the carter became standard, but didn't the eccentric arm or the whole pump change at some point on the 200 in the late 70's or so?
5. Anyone know the timeline for the various pumps?
6. Anyone have any strong preferences in their selection(other than electric)? Resons why?
I'm swapping back carbs so I'll change to the NOS '66 at some point and see what it does, after some mpg and plug readings. I like the idea of going back to the '66 'Motorcraft' pump (the one that looks like it was an adaption of the '65 pump) in part cause it was original (which for me is nice when it works) and it appears to be serviceable, which raises one last question...
7.Anyone know if the bladder assembly for the '65 'filter on' pump would work with the '66 'Motorcraft' pump?
Thanks in advance for any and all input!