This is to all the people out there that a smarter than me so so i gues thats every one.
i had an argue ment with a mate who is 4:11 mad. every thing has to have 4:11 gears or its shit.
i dissagrea, i figure it this way a high reving low torque engine eg a rotor would benifit from 4:11 as it would rev up quickly enuf to use them eg, produce wheel spin, and not load up engine.
where as if u put 2.92 s in the rotor it wouldnt have the torque to over come the load on it so it would rev up slowely and not wheel spin and prob not do much at all.
BUT with a high torque engine eg 12 litre cummins truck diesl, if u put it in a car with 4:11 s it would be so damm slow because there wouldnt be a load on the engine as it would be reving up aS QUICKLY AS IT WOULD IN NEUTRAL, and im guesing that it woulnd be using the potential torque or hp from this engine, but if u put 2:1 diff gears in it it, would fly as you would be using the gears to load up the motor and use the torque potental the engine got.
i had an argue ment with a mate who is 4:11 mad. every thing has to have 4:11 gears or its shit.
i dissagrea, i figure it this way a high reving low torque engine eg a rotor would benifit from 4:11 as it would rev up quickly enuf to use them eg, produce wheel spin, and not load up engine.
where as if u put 2.92 s in the rotor it wouldnt have the torque to over come the load on it so it would rev up slowely and not wheel spin and prob not do much at all.
BUT with a high torque engine eg 12 litre cummins truck diesl, if u put it in a car with 4:11 s it would be so damm slow because there wouldnt be a load on the engine as it would be reving up aS QUICKLY AS IT WOULD IN NEUTRAL, and im guesing that it woulnd be using the potential torque or hp from this engine, but if u put 2:1 diff gears in it it, would fly as you would be using the gears to load up the motor and use the torque potental the engine got.