A
Anonymous
Guest
Isky think that its easy to remove the need for a dual pattern cam with more duration on the exhaust simply by adding headers and that with the header and a dual pattern its easy to get too much on exhaust and loose torque (as they think dual pattern cams do anyway)
Its interesting that the 2V along with the bigger inlet came with headers as standard. Obviously Ford may have thought that this would be sufficient to even things up and it seems to back up what Iskysay.
After reading what they have to say, a dual pattern cam for a 2V may be fine but I would be a bit reluctant to see the need for it until someone comes up with some solid dynoe figures to support it. They seem to have a fairly solid foundation for saying that dual pattern cams result in loss of torque from experiences taken from Oval track racing. Anyone else heard of this?
Its interesting that the 2V along with the bigger inlet came with headers as standard. Obviously Ford may have thought that this would be sufficient to even things up and it seems to back up what Iskysay.
After reading what they have to say, a dual pattern cam for a 2V may be fine but I would be a bit reluctant to see the need for it until someone comes up with some solid dynoe figures to support it. They seem to have a fairly solid foundation for saying that dual pattern cams result in loss of torque from experiences taken from Oval track racing. Anyone else heard of this?