Holley 1940 CFM

63Futura

Well-known member
My carb has been identified as a Holley 1940. Does anyone know what the CFM flow rate of this carb is? I have tried looking it up, but can't find anything.

Also, thoughts on whether or not this is a good carb for my Falcon?

Thanks!
 
Howdy 63 Futura:

I'm away from my references so this is from memory. The 1940 is a replacement carb for 200s after about '76. They are rated at about 190 cfm and are used with cable linkage and have no Spark Control Valve port.

It would be a nice upgrade for your '63 Falcon 170, but would require linkage adaption, or conversing to cable linkage and have it has no provisions for a Spark Control Valve for syncronizing with your Load-a-Matic distributor.

Adios, David
 
David,
Thanks for the reply. But, um, the carb has been running reliably on my car for a bit over 20 years now. As long as I can remember the carb has been on there.
I basically was wondering what the flow rate of the carb was (Thank you for the info), and thoughts on it's flow rate compatibility for the engine with the AZCoupe headers and Pertronix 1 I recently had installed.
Thanks again.
 
I think the 1940 was used earlier than '76. It does have a spark control valve and is setup to use the mechanical linkage, not the cable linkage (not to say other model variations don't exist - we all know how Ford liked to change things every time the wind shifted).

You can see pictures of the 1940 at Pony Carbs website:

Holley 1940
 
Just found this post by steve from April 17, 2003. It should answer your question:

steve":2umfv2hd said:
As for the carb, the air flow required by any piston engine is related to the amount of air the the engine requires, i.e., internal cumbustion engines are air pumps. The air requirement is calculated as follows:

((CID x rpm/2) / 1728) x VE

In the case of our 200ci I6's, the factory NET HP rating is 91 @ 4000rpm. So, if the engine were 100% efficient (a VE of 100% - not a chance) the cfm requirement would be 231. While I don't mean to offend you (I have one also), the stock log head is very inefficient. My analysis says 75% is the correct number. So, 231 x 75% = 174cfm. Bottom line, you need a carb with a minimun flow of 174cfm on your car. The stock 1940 flows approx. 180cfm. Marginal at best. Since you have a header and upgraded ignition you have probably improved the efficiency of you pump enough to be too much for the 1940. Having said that, do not rush to the bigger is better side (the dark side in my opinion). Both carb volume and velocity need be considered.

Simply stated, HP requires intake volume (high rpm, big flow, - head and cam to match). Torque rsponds better to intake velocity. As produced, our cars are built for low end torque. Why? As an old saying goes ...you race HP, but you drive torque... So, when you are ready for your carb upgrade I think it hard to beat a progressive 2V like the Holley 5200 or the Weber 32/36 on a street car. The progressive design helps to keep velocity up as it runs on one venturi until the rpms come up enough to handle the extra volume. The 5200 flows 270 cfm (will support 5000 rpm @ 90% VE - probably never see 90%) and has a total venturi volume of 1.77" vs. the carb bore volume of 1.77 for the stock 1.5" head (through 1969),and 2.40 for the stock 1.75" head (1969 "M" and up). The 32/36 Weber flows 320 cfm and has total venturi volume of 2.9 sq. in. So, I wouldn't use this one on the early head. Actually, I have a hard time justifying the 320 cfm on a car that is used on the street. On the other hand, if you are building a car that is going to be expected to come out of the hole at 3000 rpm and shift at 6000, volmue will be king. A 500cfm Holley 2300 would probably work well on such a car, but only if prepared like Mustang Gezeers.
 
I have the same carb on my '65 Mustang. Just a couple of notes:

The previous owner of my Mustang told me the choke didn't work. I thought the choke coil was bad, so I tried to find a replacement. I tried NAPA, Ford dealer, etc but couldn't find a replacement. Now this was before I got onto the Internet. But replacement parts other than the rebuild kit MIGHT be a problem.

It does have a Spark Control Valve.

My carb's performance is fine. I purchased a Pony Carb and expected better performance and milage from their carb. They were both the same. As a matter of fact, the Pony carb stumbled real bad off of idle, which is on of the problems that they advertise that they fix. My 1940 is real smooth with no stumbles or surges.

My 1940 is still on my car and is working fine. The Pony carb is in a bag on the back shelf of the garage. Most guys here have had real good luck with Pony. My experience was terrible. I placed around 10 calls to them the summer I installed their carb and tried to make it work. They told me the balancer was off, my timing light was junk, my distributor was bad, etc.

The 1940 has a vacuum pull-off like Rochesters. The original carb has a spring that holds the choke closed. I personally like the pull-off.
 
Back
Top