I'll wait for someone else to respond, but here is my lengthy opinion.
Please don't be alarmed at all the math and rules. You don't have to understand it all!
Here are the flow ratings for each jet 'call size'.
285 cc/min or 60 thou nominal, 60 call size jet
298 cc/min or 60 thou nominal, 61 call size jet
311 cc/min or 61 thou nominal, 62 call size jet
325 cc/min or 62 thou nominal, 63 call size jet
341 cc/min or 64 thou nominal, 64 call size jet
357 cc/min or 65 thou nominal, 65 call size jet
374 cc/min or 66 thou nominal, 66 call size jet
392 cc/min or 68 thou nominal, 67 call size jet
411 cc/min or 69 thou nominal, 68 call size jet
429 cc/min or 70 thou nominal, 69 call size jet
448 cc/min or 73 thou nominal, 70 call size jet
470 cc/min or 76 thou nominal, 71 call size jet
492 cc/min or 79 thou nominal, 72 call size jet
517 cc/min or 79 thou nominal, 73 call size jet
542 cc/min or 81 thou nominal, 74 call size jet
566 cc/min or 82 thou nominal, 75 call size jet
587 cc/min or 84 thou nominal, 76 call size jet
615 cc/min or 86 thou nominal, 77 call size jet
645 cc/min or 89 thou nominal, 78 call size jet
677 cc/min or 91 thou nominal, 79 call size jet
703 cc/min or 93 thou nominal, 80 call size jet
731 cc/min or 93 thou nominal, 81 call size jet
765 cc/min or 93 thou nominal, 82 call size jet
Rule 1:
Peak fuel flow Rule I am of the opinion, from all the information searches I've done, that each cc per minute flow can be multiplied by 5.5 to get the flywheel HP the engine should produce.
So I'll answer you question by asking you one. How much HP do you think the engine would produce if it was idealy jetted?
If its 100 hp net (which is 125 hp gross) then use 100 times 5.5, or a 550 cc/min jet. That should make a 74 call size jet.
Rule 2:
The ideal jet size rule is the throttle venturi diameter divided by 20. Since I don't know how big an Autolite 1100 is, I don't know the ideal jet size. If the jet gets too big for the venturi size, it won't atomise properly, and will not meter its fuel right. I think most 1100's ran 1 inch venturis, which suggests a 68 thou jet diameter, or a 67 call size jet.
Rule 3:
The ideal carburation rule This is a simple square inches of carb venturi verses cubic inches of engine capacity rule. Little base model Falcons and Mustangs in the 1960's were the most under carbed engines on earth. 351Clevelands with 780 cfm Holleys or Autolites were the most over carbed engines. The sixes often had about 1 square inch of carb venturi, and this served 200 cubes of engine. Hotter Small block Ford V8's had only 50 cubes of engine for each 1 square inches of carb venturi. When you have a small carb on a big engine like we do on our sixes, we can often go for a bigger jet than the venturi diameter divided by 20 rule. So you may be able to go over the 67 jet size you have by a considerable margin.
Important Note:-
Some believe these formulae over jet engines as they are of the opinion they don't allow for the extra squirting of the power valve channels. The forumula does incorparate this, so it will be very close. However, some engines have very big power valve channel restrictions, and these can make these selections I suggest too rich. So the idea is to find the likely maximum size jet, and try jetting upwards in small degrees by road testing and then gas analyser checking until you get it working well.
There's a bit in it, you can check this thread if you want to get confused! Already, I'm checking just how much the power valve enriches the high rpm fuel supply.
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8106
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7015