Keep yer 170? U don't need a 'double sump' like that.chad":3uxc3edg said:U no what Idid, no cad or pain, works.
![]()
Have not climbed any mountains yet tho
Quicker, easier IMHO~
Keep yer 170? U don't need a 'double sump' like that.chad":3uxc3edg said:U no what Idid, no cad or pain, works.
![]()
Have not climbed any mountains yet tho
bubba22349":3cuc6moi said:Nice job Bob did you also install some internal baffles to keep the oil around the pick up?![]()
![]()
My oil levels are the same as stock, most of the extra capacity is in the wings, oil is level or down below that high portion of the pan which basically in the same position as the higher part of a stock pan, it doesn't take much to see where the extra 3 quarts are.Hi Mike - FWIW there have been some dyno run made on (I believe) Engine Masters indicating that extra oil capacity - if it raises the oil level in the pan over stock - result in the oil being whipped by the crank into a froth which reduces HP. Just an FYI in case it may help. Gale Banks also found the same to be true with truck differential covers promoting extra oil capacity - it actually reduces lubricity and oil dispersion.
Perry, lavron'n powerband's pic show. None for Bob ot Bob the builder. May B that wuz ike da ol daze'n nota constraint of the new...
All my pictures are hosted off-site that is why they show, the update did not affect links I would say, that is my guess anyway.@chad,
All my photos for many months have been in the gallery attached to this forum - was that wiped out by the forum update? I see that the message menu has completely changed. Is there still a way to get to the gallery?
Thanks
Bob