Six cylinder history

A

Anonymous

Guest
New here, but got a Mustang Six history question.

Back about early in 1965 FMC was pushing the big six in their advertisements for the Mustang just for a few months only. About same time was a few paragraphs here and there that the new Mustang was going to replace the Falcon in European Rallies. Due to gas mileage, it had already been decided that the six was better than the V-8 for them. Those same magazine paragraphs mentioned several specially modified (and unique?) 200 engines were being built by some noted specialist engine builder, just for the European races.

I used to live within eyesight of Riverside Raceway, and one early spring day going to work I saw a bunch of notchback Mustangs going around the course, each with a number on the doors. I quickly rolled open the windows to listen, but did not hear the normal V-8 exhaust sounds. Racing section of newspaper mentioned that FMC was testing a few Mustangs in preparation in being shipped to Europe for competition. (Those at Riverside?)

Now decades later, my six was pooped. Looks to have been rebuilt a number of times by a sloppy machinist. My (now dead) friend from the old 1970's Ford Drag team did some telephoning and found a hottie six for me that only needed reburbishing. It was last raced in late 1960's then the engine pushed under a bench. Sold to several others time after time, one of which must have sold off the cylinder head.

What I finally purchased just a couple of years ago, was told to me to be one of those rally six cylinder (seven main bearing) engines, without the modified cylinder head. The seller was located only 20 miles from the Riverside Raceway, and did not know if it actually went over to Europe, or was considered one of the spare engines. Inside this engine was a work of art. Near everything was polished. I used my own standard head, carburetor, and oil pan which after painting sort of detracted from the appearance and effort put into it. But, it works good, bolted right on to my items, and installed just fine.

I would like to know if anyone has heard of these special six cylinders. I presume that not too many were built, for the V-8 was overall a better investment.

Am having troubles in setting valve lash now too. It has mush lifters, but with the solid type rocker arms. The rocker arms on a steel shaft with an adjustment at the end like as used on the 170 CID engines, not via the center individual stud so popular into the 1970's. Via an old FMC publication on how to modify the V-8 260, it says to set gap at about .100" and that will center the lifter into the range. I used this. Should I have? For never saw anything printed on this engine.

Too obscure?


Wm.
 
Can't say that I heard of your history on the six however nothing suprises me. So it sounds like you need a good flowing head for your little racer so be sure to check out Mike's other site. http://classicinlines.com/

Also be sure to get yourself a copy of the Ford Six Performance Hand Book by members David and Dennis Schjeldahl

But best of all welcome to our little bit of crazyness/sickness of everything six
 
EDIT:

Everyhting I see says they raced V8's. I thought there were some rallypack Falcons raced at Monte Carlo with hopped up sixes but I cant find any data on that at this time.

I have read that Ford was handicapped very heavily for the V8's so maybe there was work to develop a hipo I6 to get rid of the handicap?
 
its a shame the head's goen. it it really is what you think it was im sure the head would have had very extensive work done to it over a stock casting.

good luck in your search for info. please post whatever you may find. im very intrested :D
 
Well, only other thing I can remember is that one or two of the European events were televised on Wide World of Sports.

Apparently the teams starting out from Norway liked the six, for they installed big (1968?) fuel tanks in back, which increased their range to better than 500 miles per tankfull. Then, apparently they were able to eliminate one or two pit stops for fuel and tires when going to Monte Carlo. They liked the lighter 200 six for it went through snow good, and cornered better than a V-8. I think the Mustang V-8 powered cars were the ones the press was watching instead. The full majority of the Mustangs had V-8 engines under the hood.

Wm.
 
might have been Stroppe prepped Falcons??? It would have been around the time they were prepping them for the econo Nascar class. check in the roundy round section theres and article about the falcons in nascar might have a mention of the rallye cars :unsure:
 
That does sound familiar, but I was thinking that Stroppe was getting more in to the off road Broncos at that time. They had a dismal time on high banks with Mercurys for 1964, after an OK season in 1963.

However, in general, the firm was well suited to making up International racing autos.

Have old issues of Road and track, Mechanix, etc. but have been through them many times and cannot find much.

Wm.
 
To possibly add to your story;
I came across a guy with a '65 Comet with a tri-power on it at a local car show a few years ago. Being that I was in the process of building a tri-powered 200, I asked about his setup. He ranted about how the tri-power setup was useless & couldn't be made to run properly(way too rich). He stated that he even had a factory modified(prototype?) racing head that Ford used somewhere & it didn't work either. He had blocked off the end carbs & was running only the center Autolite carb. The car had a sweet lope at idle & sounded really good.
Maybe he had one of the heads that Ford built for your engine?
I wish that I had tried to buy that head, but I had a newborn at the time....;-(
 
Back
Top