The
stroked 200 -250/4.1l was a late 60's solution to the problem of higher performance expectations/needs along with the much higher sustainable interstate cruise and modern
'commuter speeds'. The legacy 1:1 final drive trannys with high gears (low numerically) made early cars drivability seem even older.
The 250 with its significant torque increase enabled the six, even with the legacy higher gears rears and 1:1 final - C4 and 3/4 spd manuals, to closely match V8 performance. The 250 has never been a MPG winner but continued the
anvil strong small block six Ford reputation thru 70's although saddled with power and MPG robbing early emission schemes..
.. by early 80's once OD trannys both auto and manual became widely available, the lower rear gearing and better emission crutches, the engine development focused more on optimizing MPG and performance within the critical RPM
powerband.
IMHO -The 250 is a great upgrade to any 200 car for increasing
modern drivability. A real advantage is that the 250 is all SBF V8 parts from FW - clutch - bellhouse - starter . This enables the use of any transmission that could bolt to the venerable '302' Windsor V* series.
I have two cars with 250's and
Overdrive trannys and low rear gears. With the torquey 250's low RP
M grunt and an available gear for backroad carving, demanding traffic or the interstate drive to and from the dragstrip...
hav e fun
'61 Comet 250/T5.OD/3:80 rear/TriPower - 74 Maverick 250/T5.OD/3:80:1 rear/Supercharged - '63 Falcon 4dr Wagon /170/T5.OD OEM 3.50:1 rear/Tube radio.