Don't flame me and say to use the Search feature to find out. I have and the information I found was old (5+ years) and inconclusive.
On a stock engine with a 250 2V head, which 2V carb would be preferred, a progressive (like the weber 32/36) or synchronous (Motorcraft 2100)?
The threads I read on the subject stated that, because of the orientation of the carb on the intake (throttle shaft perpendicular to the head) the synchronous carb would be the better choice. The concerns on the progressive carb was either possible leaning of the cylinders or driveability.
Now that time, and mileage, has passed with members having their heads and carb choice installed, I wondered if this still holds true.
Please state what carb you are running, how it is doing, and which way the throttle shaft is oriented relative to the head.
Thanks.
On a stock engine with a 250 2V head, which 2V carb would be preferred, a progressive (like the weber 32/36) or synchronous (Motorcraft 2100)?
The threads I read on the subject stated that, because of the orientation of the carb on the intake (throttle shaft perpendicular to the head) the synchronous carb would be the better choice. The concerns on the progressive carb was either possible leaning of the cylinders or driveability.
Now that time, and mileage, has passed with members having their heads and carb choice installed, I wondered if this still holds true.
Please state what carb you are running, how it is doing, and which way the throttle shaft is oriented relative to the head.
Thanks.