Probably a can of worms but better than an oil thread I suppose for the start of winter. What temp thermostat should I run in a 170? Manual for '64 lists low temp and high temp (presumably 180* or 195*). I'd think 195* should be better for reduced engine wear and increased economy, as well as more heat for those top down winter days. 180* maybe for a tick more performance if jetted appropriately for a more dense charge through the tiny restrictive log.
Reason I ask is I have the heater box out of a '64 Falcon for a rebuild, replace a seized blower motor, as well as change the failed coolant temp sensor. Coolant was dirty when draining, flushed out a lot of crud and checked temp with IR gauge while flushing with some cycles to temp but it never got to temp idling. 140*-150* at thermostat housing and along driver side of head back to coolant temp sensor. Gauge works with new sensor, highest I saw was barely touching the low end of normal range. Figuring it's a stuck open thermostat or PO removed it. Considering whether to get a 180* or 195* thermostat. Thoughts?
Reason I ask is I have the heater box out of a '64 Falcon for a rebuild, replace a seized blower motor, as well as change the failed coolant temp sensor. Coolant was dirty when draining, flushed out a lot of crud and checked temp with IR gauge while flushing with some cycles to temp but it never got to temp idling. 140*-150* at thermostat housing and along driver side of head back to coolant temp sensor. Gauge works with new sensor, highest I saw was barely touching the low end of normal range. Figuring it's a stuck open thermostat or PO removed it. Considering whether to get a 180* or 195* thermostat. Thoughts?