Great work mraley. This is gold!!!! Time to include you all in you own kind of Power and Quarter Room Sticky! There are guys and gals here who have been nice enough to give us timeslips, and post there power readings. We salute you all!
I am not at all sceptical, as anyone who pays for a dyno or timeslip has a legitamate claim to fame, and deserves free rounds of beer and life pearge in the 100+ Club!.
That compares with
There is basic info from Ak Millar on 65 rwhp stock with the 200 .
kastang's Mustang 2V at 105 hp in 8:1 compression 200 form with no mods inside.
Mustangaroo had about 105 rwhp in stock 200 2V form,
80Stang, you got about 100 hp at the back wheels in Gen 1 with just the stock bits mit good cam, and your site has great info on the Gen 11 engine.
MustangSix did some DeskTop Dyno simulations from 100 to 170 hp with various combos.
Hudson Nut into the 185 hp mark with a flattie 354 dueced Huddy six
Dynoed250 into 290 hp or more flywheel with his EFI 4.1
Does 10's into the 200's with his stock but cammed and turboed 250
There were others.
I've got all the most of the stock net flywheel readings and rear wheel dyno runs from factory Ford sixes, and 77 hp in petrol in my 4.1 XE, then about 100 hp in LPG before headers, so I'm not even close!.
I always take dyno readings with a grain of salt, becasue the calibration is critical.
In real terms, a manual will loose 26.5% power at the wheels with a set of 205 section tires and a T5 and 7.5 to 8" diff. The autos loose about 33% for a C4 and similar diff and tires.
The repeatability of dynometers is not that good unless the calibration is verified. Its easy to go accross town and gain 40 rwhp without changing the engine.
In Australia, Wheels used to have independent Dyno tests, and there were a wide variation, up to 65% less than the factory rate net figures, so its clear that any given dyno could be +/- 25% out without the owner knowing.
Again, just being analytical, not wanting to take an iota from your amazing work.
Michael, you da man!!!!!
