Bell housing locating pins

[Anonymous]

I have a 200 laying around that I was planning on using for parts.

I know for sure it came out of a Mustang.

Will that pan fit?

-Zim

 

[Bort62]

I have a 200 laying around that I was planning on using for parts.

I know for sure it came out of a Mustang.

Will that pan fit?

-Zim

yes

 

[Anonymous]

So I was surprised to find this thing with a '66 date part number and
a 67 dated engine tag. As someone else mentioned, must have been from a Falcon or some such thing.
-Zim

Ford's part #'s don't neccessarily indicate year of manf., only when that part was first introduced into production. So as long as Ford didn't change anything on the block it would be correct for later years. (until the next engineering change)

 

[Funky Cricket]

question: if you have a 200 laying around, why are you putting the 170 in?

 

[Anonymous]

200 is old and tired out of a 66 Mustang - it needs to be rebuilt.

The 170 was just recently rebuilt - and my Ranchero originally came
with a 144 - so they look about the same.

 

[Anonymous]

It would be interesting to see how many main bearing this thing has as well.

Just for the record - this engine has 4 main mearings.

And to finally follow up to the original purpose of this thread - the torch and vice grip combo worked great!

I got the pin out, touched the burrs on the grinder, turned it around, and pounded it back into the C4 hole location.

-Zim

 

[kukm66]

Well now, we have another contradiction to the data posted on the Falcon Performance site. According to the table, the 1966 170 had 7 main bearings and in 1965 it had 4.


http://falconperformance.sundog.net/facts.asp