Howdy All:
Well, in fact, the early, kidney-shaped chamber 170 head has some advantages, none are performance related. The smaller chamber has a higher quench to bore ratio, and, I'm guessing, about 48 to 50 cc chamber volume, with .020" milled off of it.
In this case, with an aftermarket, composite head gasket of .050" compressed thickness, Nick's CR will be about 8.8:1- not too bad.
The bad news is that the 170 has about 890 cc of intake tract volume, 1.52" intake and 1.26" exhaust valves, and a 1.5" carb hole. Compared to a late model 200/250 of 1245 cc intake volume, 1.75" intake and 1.38" exhaust valves and a 1.75" carb hole.
A cam with a bit more duration and lift will be a help crutch too, with an early 170 head on a 200.
Clearly, the 170 head will be a limiting factor on the bigger 200 block, but if that's what Nick's got, that's the cheapest way to go.
Nick, I'm hopin' you'll stand the expense of freshen this head with new valve stem seal, a three angle valve job and maybe back cut the intakes.
Mugsy- the higher compression concern is an early small chamber 144 head on a 250 block. I don't know which edition of the Handbook you've got, but that statement has been refined and clarified in later versions. We're currently shipping the 5th edition. It's now at 100 pages and growing. Shrouding is always a problem with our engines small diameter bore, the early chambers only made it worse. Anyway, glad to hear someone is reading the Handbook.
Adios, David