Engine block electrolysis

Bill1958

Well-known member
DSCF5168.JPG
DSCF5364.JPG

I know that there are a bunch of videos on youtube on this subject...like everything else in this world...some good...and some bad.
I don't claim to have all the answers on this process...but I'd like to share what I've learned and hopefully it will help others if they want to try it.

I'll start off by saying...if you have a machine shop near where you live that offers a Thermal Cleaning Process for your engine block...do yourself a favor and for around $200 bucks your block will come back cleaner than you can ever do at home. Cast Iron blocks are baked at 500 degrees...any oil, paint or contaminants are turned to ash. From there...the block is shot peened. Then...to the shaker...which removes any shot left in the block. The shop near me offered this process for $180...which I thought was a pretty fair price.
But......my budget is so small that I couldn't even afford that. Also...I really wanted to try the electrolysis rust removal and see how it comes out.

***********WARNING**************

THIS ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS SET UP IN A 55 GALLON PLASTIC DRUM CREATES A LARGE AMOUNT OF HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN GAS (other names: HHO, HYDROXY or BROWN'S GAS). THIS GAS IS MORE THAN FLAMMABLE...IT IMPLODES AND THEN EXPLODES AND COULD DESTROY YOUR GARAGE OR SHOP AND YOUR LOVED ONES.
PLEASE....DO NOT EVEN THINK OF DOING THIS INDOORS....EVEN WITH A FAN AND THE GARAGE DOOR OPEN. THE GAS CAN COLLECT NEAR THE CEILING AND YOU'D NEVER KNOW IT TILL IT'S TOO LATE. -----------------------------SET THE DRUM UP OUTSIDE IN OPEN AIR--------------------------------------
IF YOU CHOOSE TO TRY THIS PROCESS.....YOU DO SO AT YOUR OWN RISK OF PROPERTY AND LIFE.

(ok...now that's out of the way)

So...for around $75 bucks I was able to set up the system and get the block done.
What I used for my set up:

I already had a 200amp charge/start battery charger...so that's what I used for my 12vdc power supply.
I've seen others use the smaller 10amp chargers...and they seemed to get good results...but had to run it a few days longer.

A note on battery chargers and amp settings........just because you have your charger set to the 2 amp setting....that does not mean that only 2amps are going to your electrolysis tank.
I had my charger set to 2 amps....and saw that my meter that's built into the charger I was drawing about 15 amps.
I verified this with a clamp meter which read 15.2 amps.
So...using a smaller 10amp charger might not be the best option. I've seen people do it and it seems to work...but how much are you over stressing the charger and how long will it last? Your guess is as good as mine.
Bottom line....like charging a car battery....the process will draw as many amps as is needed to get the job done. The more Positive and Negative plate area and the stronger the concentration of the electrolyte.....the more amps you will draw from the charger to run the electrolysis. There are other factors as well but those are the main ones.

Connect your negative cable from your charger (I used 10 gauge solid core wire) to your engine block. (make sure your connections are tight...use nut's and bolts)

(In one photo you will see a bar bolted to the block...1 wire going to a daisy chain of main bearing caps wired together. The second wire from the bar goes to the negative charger cable. Both block and main bearing caps wired together and are negative. This was my first setup/attempt.)

Connect your positive cable to your "donor" positive electrodes in series (one wire running from one electrode to the next).
Fill up your drum with water...as filling add your 2 boxes of soda wash.
Continue to fill until you have about 3 inches of water above the engine block.
Turn on your charger.
For my charger the 2 amp setting allowed about 15 amps to be drawn and produced gas from the electrolyte.
After a short while the 10 gauge wire was warm but never got hot and stayed that way for the whole 60 hours.

Cost:
If you already have a charger...then you're good. (?)
55 gal. plastic drum (craigslist) $25
Positive Electrodes (doner metal)..scrap yard $20
10 gauge solid hookup wire (I had on hand) $(?)
Arm & Hammer Soda Wash (2-54oz boxes) $15
Cheap oven cleaner (3 cans) used to de-grease
the block before putting it in the drum. $12

My first attempt...I ran the process for 48 hours at about 15 amps. I thought it looked to be done...but I was wrong. After pulling it out of the drum and rinsing it off I could see that it was only half-baked.

For my second attempt I changed out the electrolyte and also added more positive electrodes (larger surface area).
I also mounted the main bearing caps to the block instead of the daisy chain setup I had earlier.
I let that run for 60 hours at the same amperage. When I pulled it out this time it looked better...but could still see some rust. I believe that I could have let it run another 12 hours for a total of 72 without any problems. Maybe next time.
After rinsing the block off I found that the remaining rust and crud brushed off easily. Went over the block lightly with a wire brush wheel on a hand drill. Gave the block a light spray of WD40 to prevent flash rust.

Not bad....but if I had the cash I'd still opt for the Thermal process.

Hope this info helps if you choose to try it.

If you would like to read more about the electrolysis process...I found this link that gives A LOT of background on the process.
The only part of this info that I disagree with is the writer's view on the dangers of the gasses produced by the process.
(Me) - THIS GAS IS VERY VERY DANGEROUS.....PERIOD.
DO NOT DO THIS INDOORS.....EVER.
IT IMPLODES....THEN EXPLODES.

Other than what I state above...you'll find his info very helpful:
https://antique-engine.ns.ca/electrolysis.html

Hope this info is useful.
Thanks
Bill
 

Attachments

  • DSCF5336.JPG
    DSCF5336.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 16
  • DSCF5317.JPG
    DSCF5317.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 16
  • DSCF5277.JPG
    DSCF5277.JPG
    1.6 MB · Views: 12
  • DSCF5272.JPG
    DSCF5272.JPG
    1.7 MB · Views: 12
  • DSCF5269.JPG
    DSCF5269.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 12
  • DSCF5268.JPG
    DSCF5268.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 12
  • DSCF5262.JPG
    DSCF5262.JPG
    1.5 MB · Views: 12
  • DSCF5263.JPG
    DSCF5263.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 15
Bill, what material is that you used for "positive electrodes"?
 
Bill, what material is that you used for "positive electrodes"?
Scrap yard mild steel...as best as I can tell.

Had it done about 6-8 weeks ago....ready to go to the machine shop...and then the State of ILL DMV threw a curve ball at me.
Told me they would no longer emission test my only car...that if "I" repaired the "problem" they would not accept my repair as valid and would not sell me a plate sticker. The "problem" is there is 1 monitor in the ECM that will not go to a "READY" state. This was after driving the car over 1,500 miles. Ran great with zero faults. According to EPA.gov...1 monitor in a "NOT READY" state should not be a reason for a rejection status. Tell that to the state of ill.
Had to take the cash I had set aside for my 300 build and buy another car...that I really didn't need.
So....my 300 build is on hold till (?)
 
  • Angry
Reactions: DON
Scrap yard mild steel...as best as I can tell.

Had it done about 6-8 weeks ago....ready to go to the machine shop...and then the State of ILL DMV threw a curve ball at me.
Told me they would no longer emission test my only car...that if "I" repaired the "problem" they would not accept my repair as valid and would not sell me a plate sticker. The "problem" is there is 1 monitor in the ECM that will not go to a "READY" state. This was after driving the car over 1,500 miles. Ran great with zero faults. According to EPA.gov...1 monitor in a "NOT READY" state should not be a reason for a rejection status. Tell that to the state of ill.
Had to take the cash I had set aside for my 300 build and buy another car...that I really didn't need.
So....my 300 build is on hold till (?)
Yeah I remember now you were in the middle of that legal quicksand, you've mentioned it before. I even suggested I send you a S.C. title for it, lol.
Mild steel- got it, thanks.
 
Yeah I remember now you were in the middle of that legal quicksand, you've mentioned it before. I even suggested I send you a S.C. title for it, lol.
Mild steel- got it, thanks.
Yeah....just another character builder.
I'm told "better days are coming...they're just on back order".

Thinking about making my own license plate:

Sovereign
Non-Combatant
Private Property

That photo of the block on the work bench.....behind the block you can see a little bit of my 50 year old Craftsman tool chest that I bought when I was 16.
One of the first things I learned when I was young....TAKE CARE OF YOUR TOOLS : )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DON
I got my first craftsman 1979. I have added to it, but it is still the main box. The newer ones with the soft close drawers are nice!!😎
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2603.jpeg
    IMG_2603.jpeg
    3.2 MB · Views: 11
I got my first craftsman 1979. I have added to it, but it is still the main box. The newer ones with the soft close drawers are nice!!😎
And I did remove the adhesive mechanically!😂😂
A standing drawer box won't work on an ocean fishing trawler. The old metal carry-handle tool boxes: (y) Had several with designated tools in each, starting in '79 also. But after their 8 year run on the Atlantic they gradually succumbed to a rusty death. . . The quality we took for granted- nothing whatsoever is built as it used to be. Had I had the knowledge I've got now, would have seen to their preservation.
 
Salt water environments are brutal!! There are definitely more things in that “ wish I still had them” category 😟
 
I got my first craftsman 1979. I have added to it, but it is still the main box. The newer ones with the soft close drawers are nice!!😎
Yep.....take care of your tools and they'll last a lifetime....at least the older tools would.
I've got to say...most of the H.F. sockets and wrenches I've bought are holding up pretty good...so far.
I'll give you an update in about 45 years....
 
I wonder if a new owner name on the title would allow for another inspection opportunity?
I'm pretty sure...the way it works is you sell the car/truck...new owner transfers title and either purchase new plates and sticker...or transfer plates and sticker. Then the new owner would get a notice for emissions testing somewhere within 12 months. New owner would get 3 tries at passing the test before being rejected. That would be for the state of IL (ill).
 
I wonder if a new owner name on the title would allow for another inspection opportunity?
Checked into it and I guess a new owner gets a "do over". Gave my neighbor a good deal on the car...he got plates and sticker and shouldn't need emissions testing for about 12 months. He just needed a good work car for about a year to save up for something better.
 
Since I no longer have the funds for my 300 bulid (about $2800) I decided to finish up grinding down the casting crud on the block and bag it air tight for the winter. Maybe spring will bring some prosperity for all (hey...it could happen : )).
DSCF5384.JPGSo....I did have some very unexpected good fortune...had a 78' Ford 200 out of a running Fairmont...come my way. A guy owned a transmission shop for 40 years and had the car...decided to drop something bigger in it. He just needed it out of the shop and let me have it for $200.
He said it was a good runner...but I want to run a compression test on it and see where it's at before I tear it down for inspection. Will give me something to work on this fall/winter. Probably just rebuild it and keep it stock since that's all I can afford for now.
DSCF5382.JPG
DSCF5380.JPG
DSCF5396.JPG
 
That's a clean 200! Bet it's ready to run as is.
That's what the shop owner told me..."it runs strong...and sounds good with the headers".
For $200 I couldn't pass it up...so I eat noodles for a week or two.
It's not going in anything right now and I need about $400 to build the engine test stand...so I might as well open'er up and have a looksee.
I've been trying to find some numbers as far as compression psi for that year (78)...couldn't find it in a Haynes manual I've got and have been looking on line and all I found was 155 to 190 psi? That didn't sound right.
Any idea?
It doesn't have a flywheel or starter...was going to spin it with an impact wrench. Just came out of the car a week ago and still had gas in the carb.
 
That's what the shop owner told me..."it runs strong...and sounds good with the headers".
For $200 I couldn't pass it up...so I eat noodles for a week or two.
It's not going in anything right now and I need about $400 to build the engine test stand...so I might as well open'er up and have a looksee.
I've been trying to find some numbers as far as compression psi for that year (78)...couldn't find it in a Haynes manual I've got and have been looking on line and all I found was 155 to 190 psi? That didn't sound right.
Any idea?
It doesn't have a flywheel or starter...was going to spin it with an impact wrench. Just came out of the car a week ago and still had gas in the carb.
We differ here- I would not open that engine up, except the valve cover to inspect and to back all rocker arms off so the cylinders are sealed shut while it's waiting for return to service. If it looks suspect in there, then further tear down may be called for.
 
We differ here- I would not open that engine up, except the valve cover to inspect and to back all rocker arms off so the cylinders are sealed shut while it's waiting for return to service. If it looks suspect in there, then further tear down may be called for.
If the compression readings look good I might take your advise. The only history I have on the motor is that I was told it was good and ran strong.
Might be true and accurate....
Also...the seller didn't know the miles on her.
"If it looks suspect in there"....like sludge buildup or a bent push rod?
I got to ask cause the last motor I did a bare block rebuild on was 45+ years ago...Pontiac 400.
It did run when I got it together...(hurts his arm patting himself on the back)
 
If the compression readings look good I might take your advise. The only history I have on the motor is that I was told it was good and ran strong.
Might be true and accurate....
Also...the seller didn't know the miles on her.
"If it looks suspect in there"....like sludge buildup or a bent push rod?
I got to ask cause the last motor I did a bare block rebuild on was 45+ years ago...Pontiac 400.
It did run when I got it together...(hurts his arm patting himself on the back)
LOL, yes it feels good to assemble one and it does it's job. Still enjoying that satisfied feeling with the fresh 240 in the f100, and looking forward to cooler weather to drive it more.

Looking for- Yes, sludge for sure. also careful inspection of the valve tips and rocker arm contact points. These engines are so durable that if the compression is even and there's no evidence of abnormal wear at these high pressure contact points, there's plenty of life left and no need to fix what's not broken, especially with the parts quality of today. My check it and leave it recommendation is based on your report from a knowledgeable PO and the lack of oily accumulation on the engine. And the headers- someone cared more than average. Worn engines seep oil, and average owners allow that to collect into a dirty layer of black crud, as we all know. From here, that engine looks like a runner. If everything checks out, a timing chain/gear replacement would perhaps be the only refresh necessary.

FWIW, the first place to look when I was looking at a well-used truck or other diesel powered equipment was along the seam between the head and block. Engines approaching the latter end of life seep oil at the head gasket. My '90 f150 300 has had an increase in oil consumption, blow by, and began seeping a thin sheen of oil from the base of the head in the last few months. It's been worn out enough to overhaul for several years, but this latest development is an indicator that the time is near, her borrowed time is almost expired.

Look forward to the compression test.
Still recommend releasing the cam load on the valves after the CR test so cylinder wall rust is kept at bay. Takes the static strain off hydraulic lifters and springs too.
 
Thanks for your input Frank!
I forgot...the valve stem tips would be a good check/indicator...makes one go hmmm.
And backing off the rockers for storage is duly noted.
Wednesday is SSA day...so I can pick up some oil so I can run the compression test.
There "might" be enough oil left in the system to run the test (oil pan drained) but I don't want to chance it at all.
Any thing I should watch out for with spinning the crank bolt with a impact wrench?
(No flywheel or starter)

Here's something you might find interesting.
The patent was filed in 1990.....a time when most all car engines were already fuel injection / electronic controlled......and patent approved in 1991.
I remember hearing about this in the 70's I believe.....and thought it was just bs.
Something I'd like to try....just for the fun of it................
It's pretty easy to make. The patent is 16 pages with good drawings.
I just attached 2 pages but if you want the rest you can do a search of the patent number and download a pdf file.
Patent Number 5053170.png
Patent.png
 
Back
Top