rocker ratio and cam choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
I was wondering....... can the cam specs be "altered" by using a different ratio of rockers? I have been looking at 351c roller rockers on ebay and they come in 1.73, 1.80 and other ratios. If I end up using a stock cam in an attempt to save money would a non stock ratio give me some of the benefits of a hopped up cam? If so what would I go with.

Also is valve cover clearance usually an issue when going with full rollers on a crossflow? I will be using an alloy efi cover and really don't want to deal with a spacer.
 
Yes the cover will foul. Use the steel cover for a little more room to move, or get a billeted spacer - but that may be out of budget.

You'll get higher lift and marginally more duration; like what you folks call a "RV" cam. Heed the experiences of people who've had the fixings pull out of the head, and prep accordingly.
 
Addo, what ratio rockers would you reccomend with the stock cam and steel cover?
 
Spyke, the stock rockers are 1.73 and 351C/429/460 pedestal rockers will bolt on. Unless you've ported the heads to improve flow, there's probably not a lot to be gained by opening the valves much more than .500 inches.
 
If your using a alloy rocker cover you can get a rubber rocker cover gasket that is about 4-5mm thick .The normal gasket is a paper 1mm .
#JN639R

Dave
 
If I stick with the steel cover will the full rollers hit? If they do I will probably do the next best thing and go with roller tips....
 
At least with a steel cover you can easily add clearance with a hammer ala some of Smokey Yunick's experimental engines. I recal one picture of a SBC with lots of bumps in the valve cover to clear the BBC rockers he was using.
 
Back
Top