pedal2themetal45
Famous Member
I have a friend on another board that has a 66 falcon and is think about a I6 stroker?? Has anyone designed one yet ??
Thanks
tim
Thanks
tim
STROKER CRANK ?? Does someone make one??
- Thread starter pedal2themetal45
- Start date
Ford created a virtual stroker version of the 200 with the development of the 250. Although not a bolt-in replacement, to use the "stroked 200" - 250 is not complicated.
from the Tech pages:
http://fordsix.com/tech/engine/200_swap.php
The 250 was developed from the earlier 144/170/200 family of engines.
In order to accommodate the large increase in stroke from 3.126" to 3.91", the block deck height was increased and the cam location raised. Outwardly the engines appear very similar, but measuring the deck height (crank centerline to top of deck) shows that the 200 has a 7.808" deck height and the 250 has a 9.469" deck height. The cam is repositioned higher in the block to provide for crank clearance...
The 250 because of the longer stroke doesn't have the same RPM capability of the 200 as far as extreme revving. The limitations of Log breathing/Wedge head makes it logical to use the killer torque capability of the 250 at more reasonable RPM's.
Clifford Performance built Ford 250 six engine- Jahns 10:1 Pistons, Clifford rods, balanced bottom end, Fisher balancer, 1.88 int. valves, Ported and relieved, Offy 3X1, Re-curved distrib., the works...
Powerband 8)
from the Tech pages:
http://fordsix.com/tech/engine/200_swap.php
The 250 was developed from the earlier 144/170/200 family of engines.
In order to accommodate the large increase in stroke from 3.126" to 3.91", the block deck height was increased and the cam location raised. Outwardly the engines appear very similar, but measuring the deck height (crank centerline to top of deck) shows that the 200 has a 7.808" deck height and the 250 has a 9.469" deck height. The cam is repositioned higher in the block to provide for crank clearance...
The 250 because of the longer stroke doesn't have the same RPM capability of the 200 as far as extreme revving. The limitations of Log breathing/Wedge head makes it logical to use the killer torque capability of the 250 at more reasonable RPM's.
Clifford Performance built Ford 250 six engine- Jahns 10:1 Pistons, Clifford rods, balanced bottom end, Fisher balancer, 1.88 int. valves, Ported and relieved, Offy 3X1, Re-curved distrib., the works...
Powerband 8)
8)
Their is also the problem of the 200's cam already having flat spots to clear the rod bolts. There is not alot of room there.
Their is also the problem of the 200's cam already having flat spots to clear the rod bolts. There is not alot of room there.
LEROY POLL
Well-known member
HEY ADDO
.....YOU WILL HAVE TO RELEAVE THE BLOCK AT THE OIL PAN. THE 221 HAS EACH ROD AREA ON THE INSIDE RELEAVED WITH ABOUT A 1/2'' BEVEL. THE OIL PAN GASKET IS SAME BUT THE BLOCK IS ABOUT HALF SIZE BETWEEN THE MAINS.
LIVE IN GRACE
LEROY POLL
.....YOU WILL HAVE TO RELEAVE THE BLOCK AT THE OIL PAN. THE 221 HAS EACH ROD AREA ON THE INSIDE RELEAVED WITH ABOUT A 1/2'' BEVEL. THE OIL PAN GASKET IS SAME BUT THE BLOCK IS ABOUT HALF SIZE BETWEEN THE MAINS.
LIVE IN GRACE
LEROY POLL
