Back-Cutting Valves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
Turbo has a point on carburetion, I just didn't know how to word it.

So, you used intakes as larger replacement exh valves? COOL!!
I feel like I came into a conversation half way through and said something before I had all the facts.
In that case, yes I could see how the thinner intake could burn up because of less mass. Although the factories over compensate when it comes to reliability issues, I think they made the exh thicker(with more mass) for a reason. I have thought of this before but have never actually done it as I assumed the exh were different metal. (I'll go to bed tonight less stupid) Lol!!
My other plan was to use 8.2 L detroit diesel valves in a 460. The stem is the correct dia, but it is way too long. My plan was to use the lathe to cut new keeper slots, then cut the end off the valve at the right length. My concern which I couldn't find out for sure was whether the exh valves were sodium filled. As you are probably aware, sodium explodes on contact with oxygen, and some diesels have sodium filled exh valves.

Back to your situation. Since fuel distribution on a log intake is not the best, it's too bad you didn't have thermo couples (EGT sensors) in the primary pipes. This would of showed the exh temp regardless of timing/fuel/ etc. If the temp was good(even if it was rich or lean) and it burned up the valves then yes more mass was required. Otherwise you don't have conclusive proof that it was or wasn't any one thing or a combo of things unfortunately. I'm thinking though that this wasn't a distribution problem though.(or only a certain couple of cyl's would be hurt) And you said the total timing was 34? That should rule out late timing. Possibly a too lean situation? maybe. Stock angles used? then the only real reason I would guess at,and it's a guess would be the valve was too light.
Now that's not saying you can't use it, I'm saying that if/when using intakes in an exh application, you must be EXACT on your jetting and distribution/timing/etc. I would say they will work but you have no room for mistakes or no "safety net" per say.

Very interesting though, takes a pair to try something like that ! :lol:
 
Did I miss something? I wouldnt recomend using intake valves in the exhaust they are different materials. Some valves are even two piece on the exhaust.

Also why wouldnt you just purchase a set of vlaves vs cutting the stems on some there are plenty of after market valves for the 460. Money on the 460 would be better spent on the exhaust port of the 460. Some versions of the 460 the exhaust flow is not much better than 50 percent of the intake. Its not the valve size thats the problem but the port itself.
 
Hot6t Falcon wrote that he asked Manley tech about the composition of the stock intake and exhaust valves, their answer was they are the same. Is that the way Ford made them or Manley? I know that air-cooled VW's use a three part exhaust valve. I just assumed that most manufacturers used different materials on the exhaust as they are more expensive to make, and why waste the money on the intakes?
Joe
 
Simple answer, I had a huge box of brand new 8.2 valves at my disposal.

To say the exh ports on a 460 suck is an UNDERSTATEMENT!!!
But, I've done quite well actually and not by simple volume increases (hogging it out a ton). Actually I've found pretty much all ford heads suck on the exh side. Some due to tiny poorly shaped ports, other due to overly large poorly designed ports, and some due to plain piss poor design period!
The c-8 429 head picks up a lot of flow from contouring inside,filling the floor on an angle, and...hehehe, "other" things. :wink:

Also, until shrouding is a problem, yes larger valves with the EXACT SAME PORT will flow better, especially at low lift.(up to .400) Your just opening a bigger window with a bigger valve.

Something else to think about, I haven't seen a ford head yet that required porting on the floor. (lowering I mean) Basically, fords have too tight a radius in the port in the first place, and 335 and 385 series heads have the floor dropped instead of the roof raised as it exits the head. If you fill the floor on either one of these heads the velocity and therefore flow is increased. It lookes strange to fill up the bottom of a port like that, but it works.


ummm...what was the question again? :oops:
 
(I'd like to find the guy who decided to use shock towers in older fords and punch him in the mouth)!!!
If it wasn't for tight engine compartments, ford wouldn't have had to point the exh at the ground for manifold clearance. Notice how chev exh flows straight out to the side? Notice chev's breath SO much better on the exh side? :evil:
When you do a dozen ford heads in a row and then pick up a chev head, you just shake your head in disbelief. WHAT WAS FORD THINKING!!!!!!
 
They didn't help with those silly exhaust fanimolds for any of the motors, did they? I have a daft "flow test" for cast exhausts - pointing a jet of water square into the collector. The standard six and Windsor units - the flow bounces back out again!

As to different valve materials - I had understood that the exhausts had to be better quality to give durability - maybe it was easier to raise the quality level of material in the inlets as opposed to forging with two different alloys. (Though there is the residual feeling we get the brush-off once again...)

Adam.
 
One of the stock car guys wanted me to drill his heads to bolt 400 manifolds on because the rules call for factory exh manifolds. (ok,it was part my idea too) But after holding them up to see what I had to do...I noticed that I would have to build a spacer about 1/2 " thick. THAT wouldn't be obvious would it? :roll:

IT'S NOT CHEATING!! it's called...umm....CREATIVE RULES INTERPRETATION! :lol:
 
goinbroke2, I'm surprised that you've never heard of using intake valves on the exhaust side for a cheap way of getting bigger exhaust valves. That was a common suggestion when I first got into racing in the Mid-West years ago. OEM valves in old carb'd engines were mostly cast iron anyway, and the thinner structure of the intake valve simply meant it weighed less than a true exhaust valave of the same diameter, but it was the same marterial, so far as we knew. Anyway, it worked great in a race engine. [Though I wouldn't use it for a tow engine or other scenario where the engine is exposed to max effort for sustained periods of time.]

But to all those doubters out there, I assure you that valve heads CAN come off...!

Here a pic of a valve head from my Eagle Talon turbo motor. It popped off at about 7000 RPMs, and stopped the engine in its tracks! :twisted:

Valve%20Head-2.jpg
 
Ole "JP" Definetly beat Smokey to that SM. Yes indeedy. :) . OO6. Excellent topic by the way,too :) .
 
54Ford, looks like I have to go back through my spare parts boxes....I have LOTS of valves to choose from now! Lol!!
No, I've never heard of that, and if I did I would of questioned it.....mind you, why believe it now, because it's on the internet? hahaha!

I think I might add this to the list of things I'll try though! :wink:
 
Back
Top