MPGmustang":14i5xrha said:
...
extasy, sometimes I wish I was as smart (and rich) as David Vizard... Think I'm finally realizing I'm not

oh well...
I'll let you into a little secret...he may be rich now, but he started off really small. And smartness is foundational on not forgetting the basics, but using them as a plat form for further success.
Vizards greatest exploits arguably where when he was
poor. One time, he couldn't afford a 1275 Mini Cooper S cylinder block or even a 1275 Morris 1300 block, so he grabed an 1100 Austin block, offset bored the thing to take low deck Hilman Imp pistons, and found the resulting 1251 cc engine was almost as good for a lot less dough. Same with his induction systems...the 135 hp a the the front wheels 1380cc Mini his daughter Samantha drove at the drags was just a basic scrambling of bits he'd tried over the years. A true 100 mph 1/4 mile, 14 second car. And he never even made big bore four cylinder engines, he contended with air flow improvements first. He found that all the big bore engines were made for expert drivers who had years of experience, and his little engines would eclipse them for reliabity because he understood how to set them up.
And he's soo darn funny. The Mini books on A series engines showed most of his nutty professor schstic, especially when he concluded that milling certain domed Mini Miglia pistons might catastrphically reduce compression ratio. Or that it was nothing to find two engine dynos differed 40 hp on a basic 200 hp V8, and so it was better to quarter mile a car and use a little math to cross check the dyno. Or that by putting carb fuel tank foam, a standpipe and scavange pump into a Holley 2300/4150 series carb, one off roader was able to stand the car up on a 45 degree angle and still have it idle properly.
I'm seeing visions now of four Mini pistons over milled, and gaining 200 hp after a weeks worth of dyno work, or a bunch of Baja racers operating at 45 degree angles in an Icelandic volcanic crater.
Most of his work was flow bench related, he's always been, um, het up on air flow. The fact that he's lived in two continents ment that he'd have a stock 1971 1600 OHC Cortina 2 door in England, and a 1972 2000 OHC Pinto in California's APT HQ. Each car had the same basic Ford stuff under the hood (emissions, air con, C4 auto and 3.4:1 diff in the case of his US ride), but he'd rework bits with his flow bench, measuring the improvement, and then eventually dyno test it for Popular Hot Rod or whatever car mag he freelanced for. Same when getting 65 imperal mpg at 65 mph out of his 1275 Mini Clubman. A car that ran a 270 degree cam, a 45 mm carb and it would still make excellenet power.
My favorite though is the fact that he thought cylinder to cylinder flow equalisation was the key to good performance. He'd pick up an obscure Aussie intake manifold made by Lynx, and test it, and suddenly say it was almost as good as the stock Pinto 2000 item. You'd get the idea that he's just like you Richard, he'd use the stock part first, work it within a thousanth of its life, and totally mess up someone with a bigger, seamingly better combination. I've seen the work you've done with drag factors, and your just replicating what he did, but your further along the golden path.