Crustang to Mustang
Well-known member
Hey I'm new to FordSix.com and I know that this has been addressed before, but is there a nice cylinder head for the 200ci that doesn't cost over $2,500 and doesn't have a long waiting list?
Well as for a lower cost Head that you can actually find here in the old US of A and also fairly quick there are the Later Model 200 & 250 Six Large Log Heads (they are both Identical in there features). These Heads are actually quite a big improvement over the 1963 1/2 to 1968 Small Log Heads used on the older 200 Six's. The Large Logs started being made in 1969 but usually it's best to look for at least a 1977 up to 1983 Head's newer is better on these since they will have all the Factory improvements (you will need to learn to check those Design Numbers so you know what your getting). These heads need very little to work well on a 1963 1/2 to 1968 Ford or Mercury 200 Short Block but there are lots of Mods that can be done to improve them even more. Good luckHey I'm new to FordSix.com and I know that this has been addressed before, but is there a nice cylinder head for the 200ci that doesn't cost over $2,500 and doesn't have a long waiting list?
If you want a stroked 200, get a 250. Technically, a 250 is a stroked 200.Thanks for the info. I am planning on hopefully stroking my engine but I feel like the stock cylinder head would defeat the purpose.
It would be very difficult to stroke the low deck block 200, you may be able to offset grind the crank and get an extra .125 stroke, but that is only a 4% difference which I doubt you would even notice. The rod ratio wouldn't matter much on a street engine. However ditching the 200 entirely and going to the high deck 250, is a 25% increase which you are definatley going to notice. If your concerned about rod ratios the 250 is actually a slight improvement over the 200. Our 221 ci sixes are even worse, but they go quite well. As Ive said before cubes will always win, unless blown. As an aside, I have a high deck 200 which has a rod ratio of 2, which in most theories says wont give good torque, but with a blower on board, I can tell you its got plenty. rod ratios are another myth, unless your racing the car, its doesnt matter much. The BBC has a pretty poor RR, but they go like shit off a shovel.If you want a stroked 200, get a 250. Technically, a 250 is a stroked 200.
It is difficult stroking a 200 without decreasing the stroke/rod ratio below 1.5, and increasing piston side loading
Go to www.car-part.com, input "1975" "Ford Maverick" "Engine" and your zip code. At the next screen choose "6-250".I can't even find a 250 cylinder head. I don't know how I can find a whole 250 engine. But I also really don't have the money to to swap my transmission... But if I did, I'd upgrade to a 300.