My Ranchero went from a Load-O-Matic points dizzy to a DS1 triggering an MSD6A box. Unfortunately, I can't give any comparison insights, because I swapped a tired 170 for a 200 at the same time.mugsy":qwvg5juv said:Jamyers,
Good point about the DUI versus the multistrike box. I have never ran a spark box.
As for whats makes it work.. I *think* the larger gap and spark quality is the secret here.
......
So let me ask, do you have a 200 in your car? Will you be able to try one out?...
CaedesAd6":2wmejko9 said:Does the DUI dizzy work for the 144 and 170 blocks? seems like it would solve most of my timing problems....
thanks in advance
1) We recommend a .055" plug gap setting in order to take advantage of the longer duration spark that our D.U.I. Coil and Dyna-Module produce. The larger plug gaps explodes a higher percentage of the fuel mixture, hence more power. Note that you do have to have a coil and module that are strong enough to jump the wider gaps. The DUI does this easily.
2) We do NOT rate our ignition systems in milijoules because that measurement is NOT an indicator of ignition power. For example, many times our D.U.I. system has been dyno tested against systems that have more milijoules than our D.U.I., yet, our D.U.I. beats them on the dyno with more horsepower and torque.
3) Because the D.U.I. produces a longer duration spark initially, multiple sparks are not required.
4) Multiple spark systems and Duraspark systems require a maze of wiring to run between the distributor and the coil and between the distributor and the module/spark box. The more wires you have, the more chance you have of mis-wiring, a short, weather deterioration, etc. Diagnosis also becomes more difficult. The one-piece, one-wire D.U.I. is simple, powerful, and very effective. As dyno test have proven time and time again.
5) Each of our distributors are individually calibrated on a distributor machine with a very smooth advance curve. With other brands, you have to go through trial and error to get you advance curve set up properly, if it is even possible.
mraley":17e6v9pd said:Well, I had the opportunity to test out the new D.U.I. Dizzy and let me say I am amazed at the change in performance.
Installation was no problem. It is alot bigger as you can see from a stock dizzy, even bigger than the Duraspark II system that I was running.
For comparison, I ran two dyno's today. One before the install on the Duraspark II system, then later in the day with new D.U.I.
Now....The following dyno is the before and after the install today. It was a much cooler day, about 75 and very low humidity.
Before..............
163.5 at 5100 RPM's at Rear Wheels
192.6 Max Torque at 3150
After
176.7 at 5170 RPM's at Rear Wheels
202.10 Max Torque at 3270
To sum it up...The new D.U.I. produced 13.20 more HP at the Rear Wheels and 9.50 more Torque.
If you break down the cost of the new dizzy per HP gain,you can't beat it. I spent a lot more in my head swap to gain 20 HP. This is one add that is absolutely worth the money.
In terms of "seat of the pants" feel, it seems alot smoother. I used to have a slight vibration around 2200-2500 RPMs. I has associated it with the T-5 Swap. With the new dizzy it went away. My lower end torque is noticeably improved, and once again you can't beat the look.
In case you can't tell, I'm impressed!!!!! Let me know your thoughts