How much power can an I6 make? mostly stock...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
How much power can an I6 make? Without changing the head and intake and putting on a turbo..
Im going to put on an MSD full ignition upgrade , dual carb, and if itll fit a cold air intake. already have hooker header single to dual. I believe I was told a bigger cam and flattop pistons..

How much horsepower and torque should this give? On a 200

I dont know didly about motors........
 
There are a lot of factors at work there. First off which motor are you working with, what year is it and in what vehicle. which cam, which pistons, etc.

I don't have an answer for what that could theoritically yield, I think the best anyone could really do for you is maybe ballpark it. Those specifics make a big difference.

If anyone has an answer I'd love to hear it though.

Grant
 
The old day readings for 200 Mustangs were like 125 hp gross, which was less than 67 hp at the rear wheels, and about 87 to 91 hp at the flywheel (back of the engine, as installed with all ancillaries)

Basically, a stock 200 kicks out about 87 to 91 hp at 3600 rpm, and about 150 lb-ft of torque at 1800 rpm.

When you add better ignition, it won't give much extra power, it will just stay in tune longer, and idle better if the thing is set up correctly and you don't have any 'dud' parts. Your mpg improves

A well tuned 2-bbl 5200 or 32/36 or or 2100 or 350 cfm carb on a Stovebolt or Clifford adaptor will give an extra 10 hp, but only when you have improved the exhast. Adding tubing headers with a good Mustang GT style V8 style exhast, will yield a further 20 hp. Taken together, you get 30 hp extra, but on its own, without the better exhast, , the carby improvement is not worth anything.


Its not hard to see about 115 hp in there. Peak torque goes way up to the 170 lb-ft 80Stang saw that with just a stock 1-bbl carb, headers, and a 264 cam. A 2-bbl and stock 252 cam, plus good exhast won't get any better than that.

After that, the cam shaft is the major gate keeper to power and torque increases. 1.6:1 rockers can help heaps, but are not really a bolt on unless you are using a later 1978 on wards head, a much recomended swap. A latter head will help performance and economy, but the stock cam is only open for 252 degrees of the 720 degrees cylinder turns cycle. A cam like this will restrict the power and torque increases.

When you add all these bits together, the bigger 2-bbl carb, an aftermarket 264 degree cam (which stays open longer each cycle and also lifts the valves higher) , and a later head, and rebuilt the engine with flat top pistons, you'll see a huge increase in power and torque, way up over 120 hp is certain. That will be a please to drive.

The change from a 3-speed auto or manual to a 4 or 5 speed manual gearbox, you free up what feels like 5 hp on the open road, and about 25 hp when leaving the lights! Its not an easy swap for a beginner, but there are 3 to 6 mpg gains on the open road over any automatic Mustang if you update the gearbox.
 
xctasy":1cpiv5fi said:
The old day readings for 200 Mustangs were like 125 hp gross, which was less than 67 hp at the rear wheels, and about 87 to 91 hp at the flywheel (back of the engine, as installed with all ancillaries)

Wow that confuses me so much, why would flywheel be so much lower then gross? How are they measuring it then? I always thought flywheel was gross, and that the rear wheel would be about 87-95.
 
Gross measurements were done with a bare engine, externally powered water pump, open exhaust, etc. It wasn't at all representative of the horsepower as installed in a car. Net ratings have all of the engine's accessories installed as in use. Both are measured at the flywheel.

No car manufacturer measures horsepower at the wheels. That would be way too bad for advertising.
 
I got a funny question, and I just thoguht about it. I ordered a crate engine, and have no idea what year the actual engine is. If I post a casting number can you guys tell me what year it is?
 
factor in it weighs little to nothing. i have done standing burnouts with large new tires on dry asphalt with the 2.77, and my motor has never had any work done. just ignition conversion basically.

so yes. it has very little power, but once you start playing with it, you should have a great weight/power ratio. go burn some ricers ;)
 
Back
Top