66 Fastback
Famous Member
The fallacy with that myth is if you buy into the fact that the coolant is now in the spacer longer and absorbing more of the heat, you have also slowed down the rate at which it is transported away from the spacer.
And if so many folks buy into slowing down the coolant velocity to give the coolant more time to absorb heat in the block and give off the heat while it is in the radiator, how come no one advocates the other side of the arguement? Shouldn't you also slow down the air velocity so that it has more time to absorb the heat in the radiator? The same thing is going on both sides of the surface. The coolant is basically the "cooling medium" for the block and the air is the cooling medium for the radiator. Everyone would think you a fool if you proposed slowing down the air velocity through the radiator because it is so obvious to everyone that the air is transporting the heat away. Why then is it not as obvious on the fluid side of the radiator?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Doug
And if so many folks buy into slowing down the coolant velocity to give the coolant more time to absorb heat in the block and give off the heat while it is in the radiator, how come no one advocates the other side of the arguement? Shouldn't you also slow down the air velocity so that it has more time to absorb the heat in the radiator? The same thing is going on both sides of the surface. The coolant is basically the "cooling medium" for the block and the air is the cooling medium for the radiator. Everyone would think you a fool if you proposed slowing down the air velocity through the radiator because it is so obvious to everyone that the air is transporting the heat away. Why then is it not as obvious on the fluid side of the radiator?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Doug