All Small Six Weber 32/36 rough idle

This relates to all small sixes
I should also add my fan is on for the vast majority of the time because I have it set to kick on at 160 because at 170 or 180 it gets way too close to overheating for my liking since it takes a bit to actually cool
 
I should also add my fan is on for the vast majority of the time because I have it set to kick on at 160 because at 170 or 180 it gets way too close to overheating for my liking since it takes a bit to actually cool
When I was trying to get mine to work, I put my fan relay on a switch. Even running full time, I couldn’t keep the carb from Vapour locking. That was without a phenolic spacer and without a heat shield between the carb and engine and with my gas line basically on the valve cover. My engine compartment is ridiculously hot but blowing hot air around the engine compartment was just enough to keep it from Vapour locking.

It’s better now that I’ve rerouted my fuel line but I need to install the spacer and head shields before I attempt the electric fan again.
 
I would think ( as mentioned by others )the electric fuel pump and a return line to the tank would be an excellent fix for vapor loc. insulate feed line and carb base and heat shouldn’t be a problem
 
So for for now I'm trying to figure out the vacuum situation that way my booster isnt gets crank case fumes
That and why you have oil in the filter housing. I laid out the PCV system in post 169. Is yours correct? If there's oil in the filter housing it is not correct. Either the PCV valve is not functioning correctly, not routed properly, or the engine is very worn out. Oil in the air filter means a large % of the blow by is going up that hose into the filter, which should only be occurring on heavy throttle.
Getting this straight is more important than the shared vacuum port at this point.
A picture of your system would be helpful.

Also, nearly all carbs have a intake vacuum port on them, this could supply the trans.

On my intake with no vacuum port, I used a spacer with a port in it for PCV.
 
1000007154.jpg
The line that ties into the blue metal line is how the vacuum is routed. Under the metal support is a tee that connects to the transmission.
I dont have a line that goes into the air cleaner and I don't see anywhere to hook one up to.
 
View attachment 26591
The line that ties into the blue metal line is how the vacuum is routed. Under the metal support is a tee that connects to the transmission.
I dont have a line that goes into the air cleaner and I don't see anywhere to hook one up to.
Dang it, I'm confusing threads again- my bad. Thanks for the pic. That Tee where the PCV comes in is in the worst possible place, oil can run directly into the booster. The Tee should be at /in the intake, with the PCV going straight into the intake, and the other vacuum sources coming in from above. A Tee that threads directly into the intake provides the best flow.
It's obvious you have an attractive planned-out engine bay. Looks nice. Rerouting the lines may not look as nice. I have spent hours on end routing electric lines and hoses for a clean look, so I get it.
 

Attachments

  • DSC06664.JPG
    DSC06664.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 5
  • 101_1267.JPG
    101_1267.JPG
    425.1 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
The intake nipple can be rotated the other way to run everything toward the rear below the carb. A Tee would fit in place of the manifold fitting there now also.
 
So from what I gather the pcv valve needs to be lower than the rest of the vacuum. So couldn't i add an elbow pointed upwards to get the same effect that the tee would?

This is mostly a what if. If it would work I can keep it as a backup plan or quick fix. 1000007230.jpg
 
That's better. No matter what, every time the vacuum spikes from low to high- like every gear shift, or decelerating- oily vapor is shot toward every far-end of the system.
It's a fluid dynamic characteristic- when vacuum increases in an airmass with heavy particulates, the particulates are drawn in the opposite direction of the vacuum source, and toward the walls of the constraining tube.
A good visual of this principle is the windshield repair kits. Some glue is put on a crack, and a suction cup applies vacuum. Logic would say the vacuum would draw the glue toward the vacuum cup. In reality, the vacuum causes the glue to move to the farthest, deepest recesses of the crack.
It will take a while for blow by residue to affect the modulator valve and brake booster, but don't doubt it's getting in there, because it is. The closer to the intake the blow by can enter it, the less of that oil air is available in the hose to activate the booster/modulator.
Probably overkill, I always isolate PCV from everything else. Even when, in one case, I had to buy a carb spacer and drill/fab a port in it for PCV and use the intake port for the rest.
 
Those of you running electric fuel pumps if you have pictures of how you mounted it could you send them please?

I dont see anywhere that really looks like a good spot. Its all kinda meh under there for placement
 
Yes, that is supposed to be ported vacuum. It should be completely closed with no vacuum at idle.

How many turns in is the idle speed screw? You can back it up a quarter or half turn at a time, keeping track of how many turns it takes for it to just kiss the throttle stop lever without it opening the throttle blades. It should be no more than 1-1/2 turns.

If it’s less than 1-1/2 turns and it’s pulling vacuum, there’s a problem with the carb. If it’s more than 1-1/2 turns, you’ll need to do the best lean idle procedure I linked earlier.
Hi,ive built a mild performance 200 engine for a client and its got the AUSSIE performance 2v head on it from the 250 engine,extractors,mild street cam,flat top 30 thou pistons,5 spd manual,would the 38/38 carb(are they more thirsty ?) be a better option than the recommended 32/36.Its built as an every day driver,not a racer,ive been told run a fuel line regulator and set it 3psi ?Any advice gladly accepted.Thanks Mike
 
Hi,ive built a mild performance 200 engine for a client and its got the AUSSIE performance 2v head on it from the 250 engine,extractors,mild street cam,flat top 30 thou pistons,5 spd manual,would the 38/38 carb(are they more thirsty ?) be a better option than the recommended 32/36.Its built as an every day driver,not a racer,ive been told run a fuel line regulator and set it 3psi ?Any advice gladly accepted.Thanks Mike
Hi Mikez, welcome.
Yes 3 psi is the standard for the Weber.
The two carbs in question have very different character, since the 32/36 is progressive and the 38/38 is synchronous. So the 38/38 has 223% more airflow than the 36/38 for any given throttle position (up to where the secondary cuts in on the 36/38.) This will affect off-idle response and driver feel in the motion of the accelerator pedal.

The specific cam overlap@ .050", the LSA and manual/auto trans, combined with driving environment/driver style- key players in the carb choice.

The good breathing head is a plus over the log head/carb adapter if the larger 38/38 is chosen.
 
Hey Mikez! Welcome too.
Definitely do a regulator. If you the Webber in a kit it comes with one. Look at Clifford performance. Tell them about your engine build and the will pre-tune it as well. It would be a good idea to add a pressure guage as well. You will get recommendations for both carbs. I would say for street drivability go with the32/36. There are threads here discussing both. By the way too, it is good to start your own thread on your own topic. They sometimes wander but we try to keep them on topic with the title
I thought I lost this post, but it showed up. ???
And what Frank said👍👍
 
Idk if my input is worth much from how messed up my carb was lol but I like the 32/36. Even though the carb was dumping fuel it still had a great idle when the engine wasn't getting overwhelmed by the fuel. A few times I got it so smooth you could hardly feel the engine running and it was soooo quiet. Sadly those moments were short lived to 5 minutes or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DON
Hi,ive built a mild performance 200 engine for a client and its got the AUSSIE performance 2v head on it from the 250 engine,extractors,mild street cam,flat top 30 thou pistons,5 spd manual,would the 38/38 carb(are they more thirsty ?) be a better option than the recommended 32/36.Its built as an every day driver,not a racer,ive been told run a fuel line regulator and set it 3psi ?Any advice gladly accepted.Thanks Mike
Hi Mike,
Man, I wish I had that Aussie head on mine. That would give me a lot better flow. I have the original small log head with Silv-o-lite shallow dish pistons. I measured everything to a little more than 8.5:1 compression and I’ve got the T5 conversion. I am using the 38/38 and it does run a little rich. I need to add an AFR gauge so I can really dial it in.

I think the 38/38 is a great setup. Even with the poor flow of the small log head, I average 23 MPG in a mix of city highway and it’s pretty zippy. It would only improve with the Aussie head and a decent intake. The next step is fuel injection.
 
Back
Top